this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
200 points (86.8% liked)

Asklemmy

43984 readers
743 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Yes, I'm the one in the group DM that turns the bubbles green, I'm sorry.

But other than that, I don't hear many other reasons why people actually prefer iPhones over Androids. What other reasons are there?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] redballooon@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Won’t be hard to find two dozen android devices that received 1 or 2 updates and that’s it.

There are nowadays android devices that receive reliable and guaranteed updates for a number of years, but unless you know what you are looking for it’s luck.

My iPhone 6 from 2015 still got updates in 2022 when I lost it.

[–] MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Comparing iPhone to "Android" isn't fair, because people conveniently compare it to the lowest end. Compare the iPhone 14 Pro Max to the S23 Ultra for example, a phone from a respected company at the same price range. And it isn't "luck". Just a quick Google search will give you the high-end Android devices currently.

[–] redballooon@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The iPhone SE is as low end as Apple gets and it also gets reliably updates. It’s in the brand.

Also if you know what to google for you are already in the know. Plenty of people get their cheap phone from Aldi.

[–] NENathaniel@vlemmy.net 3 points 1 year ago

The similarly priced Pixels get similar update levels to the iPhone SE

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's not up to Android, that's up the OEM. Android is constantly updated with the latest security patches. These are the companies who independently decide how long their devices receive updates.

I agree that many OEMs don't offer long enough support for their android devices. Luckily, virtually all android devices are supported by an open source fork of Android thanks to the AOSP (which Apple would never offer) and most android phones are designed to work with alternate bootloaders/OSes without the need to jailbreak. So when an iPhone hits its end of life, it's a brick; when an android hits end of life, it's still perfectly usable.

[–] redballooon@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I speak my own experience. I owned 3 mid priced android phones over the span of 6 years. The second one got one planned and promised upgrade to the next major android version. This made the phone so slow it was unusable. Each felt not very well built, I didn’t miss them when I abandoned them. None received updates after 2 years.

I now have my third iPhone. The first lasted 4 years before I wanted a bigger one, it was then used up by my son. I carried around the bigger one for 3 years before I decided it’s too large. Now I own a Mini and that’s the best phone I ever had.

Each of the iPhones got major upgrades for years, but instead of slowing it down they added features feeling like I got a new phone.

None of that I experienced in android land. Unless apple makes some major mistakes going forward I don’t see me changing platforms again.

[–] kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Didn't apple literally get sued for intentionally degrading the quality of their older phones with updates over time?

[–] redballooon@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

They say so, and at some point it was even shown in the battery settings. I can’t remember that it affected me much.

If I understood it correctly it mostly affected loading times. Yes, it took much longer to load clash Royale than on the other devices. But it ran astonishingly well. Much better than you would expect from a 6yo device.

[–] kalleboo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What they got sued for was when they detected that the battery was too weak (old, worn-out) to support peak CPU performance, they throttled the CPU. If they hadn't throttled the CPU, then the phone would have just crashed and rebooted. An Android phone with a similarly weak battery will just randomly reboot.

The lawsuit was that they should have told the user the battery was bad and to just (cheaply) replace the battery, instead of people thinking the phone was old and needing a complete replacement. Which is what they do now.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

I agree that there are a lot of bad Android experiences available, but having chosen the devices I've used very carefully over the years, tbh your experience with an iPhone matches my experience with Android.

I've never had a phone last me less than 4 years, with the exception of I think my razr maxx which had overheating problems and lasted me 2. Since then I've had a Nexus 5, OnePlus 6, and now have a Pixel 6 Pro running Graphene OS. Each has been a great experience.

My old phones are in the closet, but otherwise perfectly functional. My main reason for upgrading is usually for hardware features (camera/screen quality, etc). But I feel like my eyes are getting older faster than screen tech is getting better, so this might be my last phone 😄.