this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
734 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

59594 readers
3391 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 32 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Extremely bad take in my opinion. Not supporting alternatives means you force users into installing the alternatives

[–] TheHobbyist@lemmy.zip 31 points 9 months ago (3 children)

People could be using WhatsApp if they cared about it, but they chose signal for a reason. And making signal weaken its privacy for the purpose of reaching more people is against everything they stand for.

[–] psychothumbs@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The trouble is we end up having to install both when we could be only using Signal

[–] Fisch@lemmy.ml 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Same goes for people who you convince to install Signal. They'll end up never using it because they just forget about it and they're not the ones who wanted to use it anyway. Being able to message people on WhatsApp through Signal would also make it a lot more easy to convince people to install it.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

And once those people have it installed, they'll talk to each other using signal-to-signal as opposed to signal-to-whatsapp!

It pretty much solves the chicken and egg problem, and yet they're scoffing at it as a solution. IMO it's a big mistake.

[–] TheHobbyist@lemmy.zip -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Using only signal in such a scenario is like using only whatsapp today, to chat with whatsapp contacts. What are you hoping to gain?

[–] psychothumbs@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

But it's not the same - there's a community of people doing the same thing, and with those contacts you'll be using Signal.

[–] Rinox@feddit.it 15 points 9 months ago

I would use signal if I could convince people to use signal.

I could convince people to use Signal if all their conversations were on signal and they could talk to people on WhatsApp in a seamless way.

Right now you MUST have WhatsApp if you have any kind of social life. Signal is the other app that no one has because it's kind of a pain in the ass to have two messaging apps.

I would love to switch to Signal, but inter-compatibility with WhatsApp is a must. The EU is essentially handing them a golden opportunity on a silver platter to become a mainstream app, and they are like nah, we good wtf

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This is correct, and everybody who complains about how "hard" it is to use more than one messenger app is pathetic. That's like the epitome of first world problems. People should be GLAD that they have the option of using Signal, instead of whining about how they didn't build it the way they wanted it to be.

[–] InfiniWheel@lemmy.one 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Its hard to get others to do so, for seemingly no reason. I have Signal installed, have had it for years, have told all my contacts about it. Only like 3 installed it, but quickly forgot about it. I still have to have WhatsApp installed to not fall off the world so they end up texting me from WA anyway.

Its not like SMS vs Signal where there is a clear benefit to the average Joe to use Signal, there's no difference between Signal and WhatsApp to the average person so they will just keep using WhatsApp out of habit.

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's not hard for me to get others to use it. I simply don't have a Whatsapp account or anything else. If they want to contact me, they will use the right app.

[–] InfiniWheel@lemmy.one 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Thats great, now try that with acquaintances, coworkeea, classmates or companies that only chat through WhatsApp. I wish I could go nuclear but WA is a necessity.

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Your problem is you allow them to do that to you. I simply do not allow it, and it works out fine for me. Have never used WhatsApp a single time.

It is literally not a necessity. It's a convenience that you are making yourself dependent on.

[–] Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

I can only agree with you, it is a choice we’re making.

Still I don’t feel like I want to tell people other than my family or friends to give up on me or switch to threema.

I’m still thinking about it, but the downsides are bigger than the upsides for now.

[–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works -3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Nope. Fuck people stupid enough to use FBInc at all.

[–] InfiniWheel@lemmy.one 22 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Using whatsapp is an absolute necessity in most of the world, its the only way to communicate with coworkers, classmates, businesses and even some government services. Not using it means you are essentially disconnected from the world. Good luck convincing more than 2 close friends to install Signal just to talk with you. No one uses SMS. FB really is that dominant.

[–] ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 9 months ago (3 children)

It's OK to be "disconnected."

Especially if "connected" implies dependency on one corporation which has shown general disregard for its customers' privacy and mental health.

I don't use Whatsapp, FB, Instagram, snapchat, google, and somehow manage to make my way through the world.

Believe it or not plenty of people still interact in meatspace, limited as it is.

[–] InfiniWheel@lemmy.one 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If you don't live in a place with WhatsApp as the dominant chat app I don't think you could get it. I don't have FB, Instagram, Snapchat, Google, Outlook, or any form of social media, I am as disconnected as can be. But WA is truly inescapable.

Need to ask a very specific question about taxes? The government support person only answers through WhatsApp. Need to file an insurance report and even check if it was approved? WhatsApp. Need to schedule a certification exam? Whatsapp. Hell, more and more companies and government services are moving to WA only customer service/support, like not even help you if you show up in person and in some cases their phone lines (which are "always busy") just direct you to their WhatsApp.

Its also the only way of reaching coworkers/classmates. Not for like socializing or messing around, but for group work, file sharing, scheduling meetings, sharing important/urgent announcements, etc. And good luck getting mere acquaintances to install a secondary chat app just to talk to you, when we can barely get our friends to install adblockers in their browsers. Well, there are other secondary ways to reach them, Facebook Messenger and Instagram DMs, but we both likely agree on what to make of these ones.

I hate Facebook and am aware of their practices, but they have reached an absolute dominance over communication in most of the world. You can't just ignore them in day to day life.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The people who say "just don't use WhatsApp" really don't understand. They may as well be saying "just don't use email"

For millions, possibly billions of people, it's a straight-up requirement for partaking in modern society.

Like somebody else here said, the EU has handed Signal, on a silver platter, the chance to become a mainstream messaging app, and rather than embrace it, Signal have comprehensively rejected it.

Honestly, what are they doing?

[–] Patch@feddit.uk 4 points 9 months ago

It might be OK for you to be "disconnected", but some of us have got stuff to do.

[–] Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

It’s easy not to use Facebook, Snapchat or Instagram.

Even not using Google is easy as you can just use any other search engine like Ecosia.

Sadly, not using WhatsApp would be a real organizational problem for me with people I ain’t close enough to force them to use Threema.

So I’m forced to have both apps installed. Threema for 95% of the time and 5% with WhatsApp.

[–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works -3 points 9 months ago

Doesn't give any reason to swallow that kind of sucker punch.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Clearly written by someone from somewhere where WhatsApp isn't de facto mandatory.