this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
564 points (92.7% liked)

Canada

7224 readers
376 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


๐Ÿ Meta


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories


๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Local Communities


๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


๐Ÿ’ป Universities


๐Ÿ’ต Finance / Shopping


๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics


๐Ÿ Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] grte@lemmy.ca 82 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's exactly how the article suggests setting the maximum.

[โ€“] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 36 points 9 months ago (2 children)

"Wage" is rather poor wording then.

[โ€“] overzeetop@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

Wage is worthless wording. Most ultra rich donโ€™t have wages - at least not relative to their change in worth. We need to change how taxes fundamentally work.

[โ€“] villasv@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Anyone with two brain cells can understand that it's a wordplay on "minimum wage" and the implementation of this isn't really going to rely on the narrow definition of wages.

[โ€“] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It seems unwise to rely on the uneducated masses to interpret things correctly. Perhaps clearer communication would be helpful.

[โ€“] villasv@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

That's why there's a whole text with explanations right below the headline

[โ€“] TheBat@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

There are more words????

[โ€“] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 0 points 9 months ago

As you can see, lots of people don't read those explanations.

Perhaps clearer communication would be beneficial.