this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
38 points (95.2% liked)

Public Health

365 readers
1 users here now

For issues concerning:


๐Ÿฉบ This community has a broader scope so please feel free to discuss. When it may not be clear, leave a comment talking about why something is important.



Related Communities

See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link (!medicine@lemmy.world)


Rules

Given the inherent intersection that these topics have with politics, we encourage thoughtful discussions while also adhering to the mander.xyz instance guidelines.

Try to focus on the scientific aspects and refrain from making overly partisan or inflammatory content

Our aim is to foster a respectful environment where we can delve into the scientific foundations of these topics. Thank you!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Nudding@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Good. It's not the governments place to ban people from making unhealty decisions when they don't affect others.

If they weren't put last in priority, then their lifestyle choice wouldn't only be affecting them, would it?

[โ€“] cali_ash@lemmy.wtf -5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Logically obsese people need also go to the back of the line then. Very unhealthy lifestyle, very expensive for the healthcare system. In fact, everyone that perticipates in any non-government sactioned activity, to the back of the line. We need that healthcare for our superior people!

Ok Adolf.

[โ€“] Nudding@lemmy.world -3 points 7 months ago

So then the choice affects more then themselves, right?