Formula 1

9087 readers

149 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series

Rules

Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
No gambling, crypto or NFTs
Spoilers are allowed
Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but don’t want to become formuladank.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

submitted 9 months ago by omgarm@feddit.nl to c/formula1@lemmy.world

30 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Well... yeah? If he's guilty of course most would want him sacked for it

[–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Sounds like you have some important information about the case. Maybe you should share with the proper authorities.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Well... yeah? If he's guilty of course most would want him sacked for it

Added emphasis because clearly you missed that very important word.

If he's guilty. If. I never claimed to have any insider knowledge at all, that's just a strawman you made up to get angry at.

Am I to assume if he's guilty you wouldn't want him sacked? That's kinda fucked up.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Can you confirm, do you know what 'if' means? Yes, no?

E: that's a no then.

And being against people being sacked in the event of them being found guilty of sexually harassing employees? Yikes.