this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024
23 points (96.0% liked)
NZ Politics
565 readers
1 users here now
Kia ora and welcome to the NZ Politics community!
This is a place for respectful discussions about everything that's political and kiwi
This is an inclusive space where diverse opinions are valued, but please don't be a dick
Banner image by Tom Ackroyd, CC-BY-SA
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
They're paying him for the opportunity cost, that apartment could be either rented out, or sold and the money invested elsewhere. Whether he lives in a property he owns, or one that's rented, the cost to the taxpayer is the same.
But he could live in Premier House, which will have to be upkept anyway, and not take the allowance.
It sounds like Premier house needs some quite serious maintenance work, that would make it very difficult to actually live in while the work is being done.
The issue isn't that, it's that other previous PMs who lived in their own residences in Wellington did not receive the payment. Chris Hipkins for example.
Given the retoric from the PM about belt tightening and benefit bashing, and given he owns the apartment outright with no mortgage, the optics are pretty poor.
Also he just announced he is paying it back, btw.
Hipkins has his primary residence in the Hutt Valley though, Luxon lives in Auckland
Ah yes, good point. I stand by my general point though, that it's bad optics given all he's being harping on about lately.
No argument about that, he walked right into this one with his mouth open.