this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
53 points (94.9% liked)
Open Source
31470 readers
479 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
- !libre_culture@lemmy.ml
- !libre_software@lemmy.ml
- !libre_hardware@lemmy.ml
- !linux@lemmy.ml
- !technology@lemmy.ml
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Is there a progress tracker for codeberg’s federation? I’d like to keep up with that
I’m aiming to get a gitlab install running with the experimental option of ActivityPub support and I would love to have that work with codebergs’
Does gitlab already have experimental ActivityPub? 😮
Here's the ticket that tracks progress for federation development of Forgejo. Codeberg probably deploys fairly frequently.
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Yeah, unfortunately limited to self hosted installs for now, but here’s the details for it
https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/activitypub/
That was quick 😮 If they manage to deliver creating pull requests (meaning forking from another instance and sending a pull request back), that would be huge. I'd honestly consider self-hosting.
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
This is actually planned, which is what intrigued me initially
turns out i linked the wrong page initially, here's the page that fully describes the entire activitypub implementation they're planning
https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/architecture/blueprints/activity_pub/index.html
https://codeberg.org/meissa/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo-federated-star/docs/unsure-where-to-put/blog.md#2024-02-considerations-on-mapping-and-architectural-decisions