sh.itjust.works Main Community

7732 readers

1 users here now

Home of the sh.itjust.works instance.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

TheDude@sh.itjust.works

manifex@sh.itjust.works

biela@sh.itjust.works

imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works

122

Where it stands now how much does it cost to keep this server running, and how can we help with that? (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works to c/main@sh.itjust.works

42 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Wats0ns@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the cost always come out better for cloud for a given reliability level. But this is a volunteer run thing, so we won't mind if there is some more important downtime than on reddit or Twitter. I really do think that if your objective is not reaching 100% uptime but cost reduction, then on prem really becomes the cheapest option

[–] CodeInvasion@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A very good point! We don't need constant uptime. But I worry about the hidden costs of On-Prem, and worst case scenario where TheDude is on vacation somewhere and the instance crashes, it could be down for a while. It's also not a worry I would want to force on them either.

[–] Wats0ns@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Yes, when I try to explain this to people, I always explain the bus factor concept: how many people could get hit by a bus until it becomes critical to run your business ! Running in the cloud allows you to avoid this problem, there will always be an oncall tech in the DC of your cloud provider, which is very hard to organize for an on prem system !

I guess The dudes can always give remote access to someone he trusts, but at the end of the day if a disk fail somebody got to go switch it