Collapse

3237 readers

10 users here now

We have moved to https://lemm.ee/c/collapse -- please adjust your subscriptions

This is the place for discussing the potential collapse of modern civilization and the environment.

Collapse, in this context, refers to the significant loss of an established level or complexity towards a much simpler state. It can occur differently within many areas, orderly or chaotically, and be willing or unwilling. It does not necessarily imply human extinction or a singular, global event. Although, the longer the duration, the more it resembles a ‘decline’ instead of collapse.

RULES

1 - Remember the human

2 - Link posts should come from a reputable source

3 - All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith.

4 - No low effort posts.

Related lemmys:

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

wabooti@lemmy.ml

eleitl@lemmy.ml

doom_and_gloom@lemmy.ml

maketotaldestr0i@lemm.ee

-22

Nuclear is Not a Viable Solution (insightsinnovationecon.substack.com)

submitted 7 months ago by veganpizza69@lemmy.world to c/collapse@lemmy.ml

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Long article explaining why nuclear energy is not feasible and not insurable.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 11 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Always good to remember coal plants are more radioactive than nuclear

[–] eleitl@lemmy.ml 7 points 7 months ago

Always good to remember that both coal and uranium reserves are finite.

[–] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yes, you learned your nuclear apologetics handbook very well. 10/10

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 1 points 7 months ago

Well, ye, that's one of the main talking points in the article. Another one of is the waste problem, of which coal power produces almost a million x more!