this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2023
479 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
37745 readers
497 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Off topic but I'm really happy that the developers chose Rust to code Lemmy in. Low maintenance + high performance is the ideal combo for open source server software.
There are hardly any experienced Rust developers. It's going to be a big problem.
It's a very popular language for people to learn (as per the Stack Overflow surveys) which is good for a volunteer project.
Also, being somewhat inexperienced in Rust doesn't stop you from being useful, partially because the compiler will catch a lot of stupid mistakes. I don't think that "years using a language" is a very useful accurate proxy for skill with a language without the context of what else they've done, and your article is just looking at the raw averages.
I might need to learn Rust. Java/Kotlin/C# are fine for work, but I'm interested in new stuff anyways.
I've heard the opposite from open source devs, that using Rust has increased the amount of contributions they get.
How much language-specific experience do you need? Rust is kind of it's own special thing, which is why the hype, but I don't know how hard exactly it is to break into.