this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
464 points (93.3% liked)

World News

32353 readers
338 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No they aren't. There's no substantial proof for it, and the body of people who are behind this label (IARC) aren't even a food safety body. They once tried to say eating red meat is "possibly" cancer-causing as well.

[–] 133arc585@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

They once tried to say eating red meat is “possibly” cancer-causing as well.

Because it is. Whether the effect size is significant to you or not is one thing, but there is good evidence that it has a nonzero effect. Which is similarly the case here: there is evidence of effect of aspartame, but whether the effect size is significant is up to you to decide (or legislators).