Technology

58681 readers

3997 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

605

US lawmakers vote 50-0 to force sale of TikTok despite angry calls from users (arstechnica.com)

submitted 7 months ago by ZeroCool@slrpnk.net to c/technology@lemmy.world

337 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] realharo@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

I also just noticed in the article:

TikTok urged its users to protest the bill, sending a notification that said, "Congress is planning a total ban of TikTok... Let Congress know what TikTok means to you and tell them to vote NO."

Also from a BBC article about the same thing:

Earlier, users of the app had received a notification urging them to act to "stop a TikTok shutdown."

So they were literally sending out misleading notifications (because a forced sale is not a total ban), and then the users wrote to Congress based on that...

The probability that they will sell seems really high to me, as the same thing almost happened back in 2020.

[–] Delta_V@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There's no guarantee that making the sale will prevent the ban.

[–] shasta@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but if they sell then it's someone else stuck holding the bags so why wouldn't they?

[–] Delta_V@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

because its not in the corporation's interest to incur the expense and organizational disruption if they're still going to get banned anyway - profit is maximized by continuing with business as usual instead of spending resources attempting to reach compliance

[–] Misconduct@startrek.website 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

They also claimed that it was only "old people and teenagers" who were calling in and objecting which wasn't true. One rep stood up and straight up lied claiming that TikTok users were "forced" to call. How would that even work? TikTok possibly being banned isn't a lie but all that other shit sure was. It was just a popup offering to help locate local reps to call and make their voices heard. The fact that any of you are pretending that people taking this democratic action is a bad thing is appalling and your bias is blatantly obvious. The absolute ego on all of you to act like you just know better than all of those other people because... Reasons? Ridiculous.

[–] realharo@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Do you have the full text of the notification that you could post here? Kinda hard discussing the specifics otherwise.

If it really contains the quote "Congress is planning a total ban of TikTok", I do consider that misleading.

People here are often making a lot of noise about disinformation campaigns on sites like Facebook and Twitter and YouTube (and that's just from user-posted content that the sites fail to moderate, not posted by the sites themselves), so I don't see why this would get a pass.