this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2024
1051 points (94.6% liked)

Technology

59575 readers
4163 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
1051
Microsoft's draconian Windows 11 restrictions will send an estimated 240 million PCs to the landfill when Windows 10 hits end of life in 2025 (www.tomshardware.com)
submitted 8 months ago by catch22@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world
540 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Microsoft, doing it's part to make the world a better place.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grue@lemmy.world 26 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

You forgot the "best" part, which is that requiring TPM 2.0 is purely self-serving for Microsoft in that it serves no purpose but to make it more difficult to run non-Windows OSs on the hardware in the future.

Nobody needs a TPM except for the copyright cartel trying to destroy computer owners' property rights.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Oh I mean, I thought that was implied, but yeah, go off about it, it fucking sucks!

EDIT: In response to your edit. ACKSHUALLY the TPM requirement is a big deal for corporations, because it does help increase corporate security. The thing is, the average user doesn't actually need that extra security so much and will likely never use it so making it a requirement for the consumer-level Windows is abject bullshit.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

ACKSHUALLY the TPM requirement is a big deal for corporations,

Like I said, "nobody." Corporations aren't people; they don't count.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 2 points 8 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://www.piped.video/watch?v=FxUsRedO4UY

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] capital@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I upgraded my CPU in preparation for 11 but have since installed Linux instead. It seems like you're saying simply having a TPM makes it harder to use other OSs?

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

TPM doesn't make running linux harder. People just have their biases and will happily spew BS as long as it goes with their biases.