this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2024
754 points (98.3% liked)
Funny: Home of the Haha
5760 readers
574 users here now
Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.
Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!
Our Rules:
-
Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.
-
No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.
-
Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.
Other Communities:
-
/c/TenForward@lemmy.world - Star Trek chat, memes and shitposts
-
/c/Memes@lemmy.world - General memes
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Which means jack shit, especially when it comes to an anglophone source. Anglophones can't even decide which sets of symbols represent which phonemes.
I think you're confusing the reputation of the average anglophone as monolingual with the quite storied reputation of English lexicographers. Your mouth is much bigger than what's behind it.
No, I'm not. Open ten english dictionaries and you'll find ten different schools of thought.
So if I open ten English dictionaries and they all agree that "onion" comes from the Latin "unionem" via the Old French "oignon", will you promise to stop dying on this hill? Given that I've already shown you three that agree on that very thing? How confident are you feeling? Actually now that I think, you said you'd looked it up but you've nothing yet to show for it, so what's your source?