this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2024

424 points (94.7% liked)

World News

39151 readers

2254 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Recommendations

How to spot Misinformation and Propaganda

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

quinten@lemmy.world

NewsAutoMod@lemmy.world

jordanlund@lemmy.world

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

lemmyAtom@lemmy.world

FlyingSquid@lemmy.world

424

The 10-year-old boy who has become the face of starvation in Gaza (www.smh.com.au)

submitted 8 months ago by sirboozebum@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

55 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

The Battle of Tel Hai, which lead to those protests, is a part of the Franco-Syrian war, and not even considered a part of the intercommunal conflict by many.

Ie not related to the conflict we're talking about.

In the wake of the protests, sheikhs of 82 villages around the city and Jaffa, claiming to represent 70% of the population, issued a document protesting the demonstrations against the Jews.

The leaders of the local Arab community protested the Arab Nationalists, despite the growing Zionism.

You just can't admit to Israel bearing any part of the blame. I show you history of zionists bombing hundreds of people dead and you think linking a small protest that was barely violent somehow makes the currently ongoing genocide alright?

That kind of willfull ignorance is what enabled the holocaust.

And now you're proudly displaying it.

It turns my stomach, literally.

You don't understand that I am not saying "Israel started it". I'm mocking you for not realising how childish going "but mooooom, he started it" is.

[+] theotherverion@lemmynsfw.com -1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

trying to unsuccessfully prove that it were the Jews

You didn't read the last line of my previous comment? Here:

You don’t understand that I am not saying “Israel started it”. I’m mocking you for not realising how childish going “but mooooom, he started it” is.

That being said, while the origins of the conflict are clearly multifaceted, the Zionists seem to have a bit more of a... presence in the history books than Palestinian nationalists. The rhetoric of "divine right" versus "but we fucking live here already".

It's extremely naive to think that if Hamas were to say "okay, you win, here are the hostages" that this clearly purposeful ethnic cleansing would just stop and all the hostilities would seize and that Hamas somehow had a way to enforce a seize-fire in the first place. You were saying "unironically, yeah, it would". No, it clearly wouldn't as we've just demonstrated just how far back the conflict goes.

Which, to remind you, is at least 50 years before Hamas was even founded.

"How extremely one-sided many of the arguments are"

You mean like... people saying that no matter what Hamas has done, it doesn't excuse Israel committing genocide, perpetuating war crimes, breaking basic human rights? Because, that's not "one-sided", because no matter what Hamas has done, **genocide is inexcusable. **

So do you think Israel is guilty of breaking international laws and conventions?

[+] theotherverion@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

have not issued a statement that Israel commits genocide, hence it is incorrect to assume they do.

Yeah, I knew it, you're just a holocaust-denier. Ooh wait, no, wrong genocide. Or... was it?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Holocaust_and_the_Nakba

still is at ICJ and so far they have not issued a statement

They have issued a ruling, actually.

https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2024/01/gaza-icj-ruling-offers-hope-protection-civilians-enduring-apocalyptic

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/1/26/what-has-the-icj-ordered-israel-to-do-on-gaza-war-and-whats-next

#What is in the ICJ’s ruling?

The ICJ confirmed that it does have jurisdiction to hear the case submitted by South Africa and issued six emergency orders to Israel, as follows:

Israel must take all possible measures to prevent acts as outlined in Article 2 of the 1948 Genocide Convention. This entails not killing members of a particular group (in this case, Palestinians), not causing physical or psychological harm to members of that group, not inflicting living conditions which are calculated to bring about the end of the existence of a people, and not carrying out actions designed to prevent births within that group of people. Measure approved by a vote of 15-2.

Israel must ensure its military does not carry out any of the above actions.

"It's not a genocide, it's just that our defense minister is yelling about 'the extermination of human animals', we're bombing indiscriminately, having dropped more bombs in a week than the US dropped on Afghanistan in a year, killed over 12,300 CHILDREN, keep prisoners naked in cages outside, but it's definitely just defense that we are entitled to."

https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2024/02/israelopt-un-experts-appalled-reported-human-rights-violations-against

https://www.businessinsider.com/israel-palestine-confilct-bombing-gaza-strip-hamas-united-states-isis-2023-10?r=US&IR=T

(sources for the rhetoric and stats on bombs and dead children and abuse of prisoners)

That's what most Israeli's sound like. And then you think that people are "one-sided" when they don't agree with your "NO NO NO NOT A GENOCIDE" delusions?

If there's no genocide, why did the ICJ order Israel to "do everything in it's power" to prevent one? Yes, there are still steps before the final verdict can be issued, but pretending you don't know it is a genocide is downright disgusting.

Despite committing war crimes, it is still their right to defend against terrorists.

Yeah, but not if it involves committing war crimes and ethnic cleansing.

Do you understand that no-one purposefully perpetuating a genocide would admit to doing so, obviously?

[+] theotherverion@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Even if you compare it to other accepted genocides, this one does not fit.

You haven't though, and that is the point.

So let's do it together, shall we?

Let's compare.

What is the definition of a genocide?

A mental element: the "intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such"; and A physical element, which includes the following five acts, enumerated exhaustively: Killing members of the group Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group

The intent is the most difficult element to determine. To constitute genocide, there must be a proven intent on the part of perpetrators to physically destroy a national, ethnical, racial or religious group. Cultural destruction does not suffice, nor does an intention to simply disperse a group. It is this special intent, or dolus specialis, that makes the crime of genocide so unique. In addition, case law has associated intent with the existence of a State or organizational plan or policy, even if the definition of genocide in international law does not include that element.

Importantly, the victims of genocide are deliberately targeted - not randomly – because of their real or perceived membership of one of the four groups protected under the Convention (which excludes political groups, for example). This means that the target of destruction must be the group, as such, and not its members as individuals. Genocide can also be committed against only a part of the group, as long as that part is identifiable (including within a geographically limited area) and “substantial.”

"Killing", "Serious bodily harm" "mental harm"

The death toll in #Gaza has surpassed 30,000 — a large majority women and children. Over 70,000 Palestinians have been injured. >12,300 children dead. 17,000 without parents.

https://press.un.org/en/2024/sc15600.doc.htm

Deploring that surgeons have had no choice but to carry out amputations on children without anaesthesia, he said that medical teams have added a new acronym to their vocabulary: “WCNSF” — wounded child, no surviving family. The psychological injuries they suffered have led children as young as five to say they “would prefer to die”, he recalled, adding that — although his organization’s staff are scared and beyond exhausted — they choose to continue working despite increasing risks.

check, check and check

Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part

Well Israel is deliberately blocking aid and even attacking aid convoys: https://palestine.un.org/en/259747-food-convoy-waiting-move-northern-gaza-was-hit-israeli-naval-gunfire

So, yeah, check.

Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group

https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2024/2/15/he-was-nameless-orphaned-children-lose-family-identity-in-gaza

Orphaned perhaps not close enough? Why force separation though, when the're no-one to separate them from? But don't worry, we got the actual separation also covered:

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2022-001655

Forced separation of parents from their children at the Gaza–Israel border

Intent? Hmm? Let's see what the going rhetoric is around Israel these days.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/defense-minister-announces-complete-siege-of-gaza-no-power-food-or-fuel/

“I have ordered a complete siege on the Gaza Strip. There will be no electricity, no food, no fuel, everything is closed,” Gallant says following an assessment at the IDF Southern Command in Beersheba.

“We are fighting human animals and we are acting accordingly,” he adds.

And I think you'll accept that's not a source biased in favour of Palestine, eh?

How about the people?

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/israeli-demonstrator-kill-them-all-sign/

Rating: True

That's probably not good enough though, as it's not from this year, right, so it doesn't count that some Israeli were calling for "kill them all" in 2016?

What about

https://english.almayadeen.net/news/politics/israeli-rabbi-calls-for-genocide-of-all-palestinians-in-gaza

So while the ICJ has yet to give a verdict to the actual genocide bit, they have given a verdict that the genocidal rhetoric and actions are definitely happening and Israel must do everything to stop it. If it wasn't happening, that's not a verdict they would give.

To pretend that it's not happening because there's yet to be an official verdict from the ICJ doesn't mean that we can't tell if there's a genocide going on. Come on.

Honestly, what would it take for you to admit that it's a genocide? And not even that. You're saying I'm "randomly throwing around" the word, as if there's zero indication of a genocide? The sheer willfull ignorance, it's staggering.