this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
53 points (74.3% liked)

Asklemmy

43940 readers
546 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I get meta evil, but aren’t we just blocking out any users from accessing the wider fediverse?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dartos@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well yeah he could, but he can’t retroactively apply that license change, so the Linux foundation would just keep rolling on with their own fork.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even if you're right, wouldn't the same thing apply to the implementation in Threads?

[–] dartos@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was talking about Linux specifically because it’s under the GPL license. Threads isn’t open source at all afaik, so it doesn’t really apply

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

The implementation of ActivityPub in Threads, I mean.