this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
389 points (98.3% liked)

Today I Learned

17874 readers
143 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] governorkeagan@lemdro.id 39 points 8 months ago (9 children)

To everyone complaining about DDG, what are you using? I’ve been using DDG for years now and it’s been fine for me. I have also been testing out StartPage.

[–] laverabe@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Doesn't it just use Google / Bing under the hood? If those both suck then it wouldn't improve much, right? Isn't SearXNG more about privacy?

[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Its more about the customizability. One searxng search can search through 100 search engines if you really wanted it to

[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 1 points 8 months ago

Almost all other search engines (ddg, kagi, etc) also use google / bing dataset to augment their search data.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Every time I switch to DDG I'm constantly discovering things that I can't find because they just don't pop up in the results

[–] ohitsbreadley@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 8 months ago (4 children)

...constantly discovering things that I can't find...

Maybe I'm having a stroke...but...

Wat

[–] Oszilloraptor@feddit.de 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I assume they mean something like:

Every time I switch to DDG, I tend to discover things that I can't find on google because they just don't pop up in googlee results

[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I pronounced googlee as "goo glee" and it was fun

[–] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago

I often just get 0 results on ddg, or I know that I should get a specific one and don't (e.g. recently I tried to find the painting “in a Roman trattoria” by describing it).

Google always had to come to the rescue

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

They may mean unable to find again?

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago

Ddg, what is the definition of insanity?

[–] ShadowCat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 8 months ago
[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Are you a native English speaker in an English speaking country looking for English pages?

Because as a French speaker, when I tried DDG a few years ago, it was pretty hard to have some useful results. Like, I was looking for some local results and they were nowhere to be found.

I know it got better, that it's possible to tweak this, and that I should try it again. But because the first impression wasn't good for me, it made me dubious about giving it another try.

[–] governorkeagan@lemdro.id 3 points 8 months ago

Are you a native English speaker in an English speaking country looking for English pages?

That is correct. I’ve not experienced the issue you’re facing since I don’t often search DDG in my second language but I’ve heard of people having the issue you mentioned.

[–] bufalo1973@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

I don't complain about DDG (it's been years since the last time I used it) but I'm using Qwant.

[–] soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I haven't seen anyone complain about duck duck go for several years.

[–] governorkeagan@lemdro.id 3 points 8 months ago

This thread has some people discussing how they feel it isn't great compared to others.

[–] letsgo@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

What about the past participle though? With Google it's easy - I Googled it. But DuckDuckGoed? That doesn't sound right. DuckDuckWent?

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 9 points 8 months ago
[–] soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz 1 points 8 months ago

This man ducks