36
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] elbucho@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

This is yet another example in a long line of examples of why this supreme court is awful. This is a very clear first amendment violation, and the brief is supported by two well-known first-amendment champions, and yet the supreme court decided to not hear the case. According to the 6th district court of appeals, you now have to explicitly state that a piece is satire before you can write anything satirical, or else potentially face charges.

this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2024
36 points (90.9% liked)

Interesting Shares

2842 readers
31 users here now

Fascinating articles, captivating images, satisfying videos, interesting projects, stunning research and more.

Share something you find incredibly interesting.


Prefix must be included in the title!


Mandatory prefixes for posts

It helps to see at glance what post is about and certain clients also offer filters that make prefixes searchable/filterable.

Note: Photon (m.lemmy.zip) frontend used for links above.


Icon attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS