this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
2197 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

34975 readers
115 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/1874605

A 17-year-old from Nebraska and her mother are facing criminal charges including performing an illegal abortion and concealing a dead body after police obtained the pair’s private chat history from Facebook, court documents published by Motherboard show.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LeZero@lemmy.world 572 points 1 year ago (14 children)

To the people shitting on the idea of a default defederation with Meta, how about we deferedate not because it will affect us as posters but because they are evil pieces of shit?

[–] b3nsn0w@pricefield.org 217 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (24 children)

yeah, the difference is pretty stark:

  • lemmy: we'll give you a way to dm anyone on site, but please don't use that, if you set up an app on this other open source service we're not affiliated with (which is basically an encrypted discord) we'll do our best to make it as seamless for you as possible. we'll keep warning you for your own privacy.
  • meta/facebook: aggressively keeps you on-platform for spying purposes; literally killed xmpp a decade ago and they'll fuckin do it again (if we let them)

They trust me. Dumb fucks.

- Mark Zuckerberg

(yes it sounds like satire but that's a real quote)

[–] nLuLukna@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Lemmy DM is imo actually quite important. If I want to get in touch with someone about a post, nothing more. It is an easy option, and serves a purpose. It isn't imo meant to be used for anything else.

[–] b3nsn0w@pricefield.org 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

yep, it's important that we have this capability, but it's also nice that unlike other platforms that do their best to lock you in, lemmy actively pushes you toward a safer alternative

[–] pec@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What's the name of that safer alternative?

[–] b3nsn0w@pricefield.org 16 points 1 year ago

Matrix, which is pretty much an encrypted and open-source Discord clone (at least in the same fashion as Lemmy would be a Reddit clone). I personally use Element to interact with it and have a matrix.org account, but Matrix is just like the fediverse, you can choose any instance or client you want, or even host an instance yourself. In your Lemmy settings you can set up your Matrix user, right below your email address as of 0.18.1, and if you do, a new buttons saying "send secure message" will show up on your profile, next to "send message", which will redirect people trying to message you to Matrix.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blue_zephyr@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

I mean I agree with Zuck on that one.

[–] bluejay@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Was it Facebook that killed xmpp or Google? Legitimately asking because I've always seen that blamed on Google.

[–] triarius@programming.dev 14 points 1 year ago

It was Google, they Embraced, Extended, and Extinguished it with Google Chat. Then they killed that themselves.

[–] b3nsn0w@pricefield.org 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

google does seem to be the main culprit, but facebook still played a role as far as i'm aware. these two companies also colluded a lot so i wouldn't trust either of them with anything federated

[–] bluejay@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah they can both get fucked. Cheers

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago

literally killed xmpp a decade ago

This was Google/Alphabet.

[–] favrion@yiffit.net 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That was a quote from 13 years ago when he didn't know how massive his enterprise would become. People change.

As for him, he became more evil.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] Lemmylefty@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And even if what I do is relatively tame, I want others to be protected from the wolf at the door.

[–] whofearsthenight@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This. I don't need to win, I just want Meta to lose.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Are you saying that the individuals who run these servers and instances aren’t subject to the same laws? I read the article, and Facebook complied with a court order.

You don’t think anyone running Lemmy would do the same without access to lawyers and capital like Facebook has?

[–] LeZero@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Do you have to run your lemmy instance in the US?

Maybe do it in a less backward place

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Not disagreeing with you there.

[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Every interaction on Lemmy is copied to all other federated instances. There are instances all over the world with a copy of yours and my comment. They can track and use those comments for any purpose. Its both a blessing and a curse of an open federated structure.

[–] b3nsn0w@pricefield.org 15 points 1 year ago

they can also scrape them. that's not really the point.

people can dm on lemmy, and only the two instances that host the people on either end of the dm (which may even be the same instance) store that dm. that instance may actually receive a subpoena. but all of this is heavily discouraged by the lemmy interface itself, instead prompting people to set up a matrix account instead, and matrix chats are end-to-end encrypted.

[–] peril33@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Its a social platfrom. Dont use it for personal communications.

[–] Brownboy13@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And how can we be sure that all the instances federated with any instance we participate on aren't run by law enforcement themselves? I'd be surprised if there aren't running instances by every major investigative agency themselves.

[–] WheeGeetheCat@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is why everyone should take steps to protect their privacy. You don't have to go 0-100 overnight. Just audit yourself and do a few things now. Keep those habits up. Then audit and add a few more things, repeat.

I need to do this myself, I've been slipping

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lemmy promotes using Matrix, which is a separate service, so instance admins don't need to be in the business of hosting private conversations.

Matrix is end-to-end encrypted so even the admins of your Matrix server could not provide your chats to law enforcement.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I wish Lemmy was as well. Ah well.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Arbiter@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Complying with the law is less of an issue than keeping that data accessible in the first place.

[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

But also fuck these laws and the people passing them and the people voting for the people passing them. They're the real evil.

We have to always assume rich corporations are going to do whatever serves their best interest. It's nature. Like a mantis is gonna bite off her mate's head when they're done mating. It's up to governing factors to keep them in check. On that note, +1 to defederate. They will cannibalize or however abuse Lemmy if it will make them a penny.

[–] burak@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think we’re realizing more and more any corporate-operated platform is luring us in to sell to us and sell us.

[–] FoxyZac64@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ya. That's fucked. Just ruin someone's life like that. Holy fuck.

[–] 2MnyDcksOnThDncFlr@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I totally agree with your sentiment... However they don't have a choice. They are legally obligated to turn that information over if they are served a warrant. Doing anything less is obstruction at the very least and they could be shut down and put into receivership.

The fault here is with the two individuals trusting a corporation to keep data private and to put the individuals interests ahead of the corporation. Neither is a realistic expectation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DrQuint@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I vote to write this reasoning at the very top, on the sticked topics when it happens. Like, literally just write "Because Facebook is evil" and don't elaborate.

Plus, if someone shows up being a concern troll on the point, they will laser focus on it, taking the bait, we can all just block the person, a world improved.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Any Lemmy instance would have given over the same information in this case. Meta was complying with a valid, legal search warrant.

[–] PorkrollPosadist@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If some fuckstick from Nebraska asked me to snitch on my users for something which isn't a crime in my state, I would simply tell them to fuck themselves, go ahead, and try to have me extradited. If my instance were bordering on a trillion dollars market cap, I'd hire a fucking lawyer.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)