511
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2024
511 points (98.7% liked)
politics
31224 readers
3420 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
It's a Catch -22. He's rich, therefore he must be smart. The people who vote for him think it's their fault they haven't got money. They love him because he acts the way they would if they were rich.
I like to read old comics. Pretty much every Superman cover from the 1950s shows Supes doing something that looks stupid or evil. "Why Is Superman Throwing Lois Into a Volcano?" And of course there's always a great reason, because Superman can never be a bad guy.
I actually wrote a thesis on that, the turning point for Superman covers was more in the late 60s, around the time of the Tet Offensive in '68.
Pre-1968 Superman covers:
(1965)
(1966)
Post-1968 Superman covers:
(1969)
(1970)
I'd like to know more...
https://th.bing.com/th/id/OIP.WyaafP9C5Ahx88R2bX6NRgHaEK?rs=1&pid=ImgDetMain
Yeah you haven't actually said anything here, like if anything post-68 Superman seems more of an asshole here.
That's the point, it turned post '68.
Yeah, but the comment you replied to said he was an asshole pre-68.
Edit: Oh okay, they said from 1950 on, you said the change was 1968 - he was an asshole after then. You were just saying it happened later, I thought it was maybe the other way around or something.
But why?
It's a good question, we'd need to talk to someone involved with DC editorial from back then.
But taking a primary symbol of America and portraying him in a negative light just after the Vietnam war turned really ugly sure seems to have been intentional.
It's important to note that the CONTENT of the book never really changed, just the covers.
You said you wrote a thesis, so I figured you had a theory.
Well, that's pretty much the theory. I don't have the paper anymore it was 32 years ago now...
So you gonna leave us hanging? Why did Superman throw Lois into a volcano?!
A] Alien shapeshifter revealed when they transform to escape
B] Robot duplicate
C] Only way to reverse a magic spell
D] She was pegging Perry White and that shit will not stand.
E] All of the above
He never could get the hang of Thursdays 🤷
I'm loving this new crossover. His cape would have to be made of terry cloth
Sass that hoopy Clark Kent! There's a frood who knows where his towel is!
"I caught Clark Kent listening to Vogon poetry and he didn't even have a minor aneurysm! I think he might be invulnerable."
It really is wild to me how people equate wealth with intelligence. So many people think the biggest dumbasses in the world are literal geniuses just because they got tons of money lol it's crazy.