931
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Kyle Rittenhouse abruptly departed the stage during an appearance at the University of Memphis on Wednesday, after he was confronted about comments made by Turning Point USA founder and president Charlie Kirk.

Rittenhouse was invited by the college's Turning Point USA chapter to speak at the campus. However, the event was met with backlash from a number of students who objected to Rittenhouse's presence.

The 21-year-old gained notoriety in August 2020 when, at the age of 17, he shot and killed two men—Joseph Rosenbaum, 36, and Anthony Huber, 26, as well as injuring 26-year-old Gaige Grosskreutz—at a protest in Kenosha, Wisconsin.

He said the three shootings, carried out with a semi-automatic AR-15-style firearm, were in self-defense. The Black Lives Matter (BLM) protest where the shootings took place was held after Jacob Blake, a Black man, was left paralyzed from the waist down after he was shot by a white police officer.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

I dunno about that. If you needlessly insert yourself into a dangerous situation and you kill people in self defense, there should be consequences.

He went looking for violence. He found it.

[-] aidan@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

I don't agree, that seems like it would be giving official journalists for example special privileges over citizen journalists. Give free reign to racists to lynch counter protestors, etc.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Do most journalists carry illegal guns in the course of their work?

[-] aidan@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

I don't think it was illegal, or at least the court didn't.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Do most journalists carry illegal guns in the course of their work?

[-] aidan@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Idk, I assume not

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Well that's what our legal system is for, to hash out individual cases. If someone's going as a citizen journalist that's very different from going to "keep the peace and shoot looters" and very intentionally bringing along long guns, vs pistols.

[-] aidan@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

He couldn't legally own a pistol. He was determined to have legally possessed a rifle.

[-] Samueru@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

If I'm on my way to sell crack and I get attacked by some psycho do I lose my right of self defense?

If I'm breaking curfew and I get attacked by some psycho do I lose my right of self defense?

At some point you will see that it makes no sense, the legal system already forbids killing looters, so you want them to lose their right of self defense because you don't like them.

this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
931 points (97.0% liked)

politics

31115 readers
2060 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS