this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
89 points (86.8% liked)

politics

19047 readers
3994 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It is of a lower scale than the Holocaust, because Israel is being held back by the international community. Most places in Gaza are either already in famine or will be soon at this rate. If Israel has its way the scale will match these genocides (as a proportion of the population of course). I do agree that comparisons to the Holocaust are exaggerations and therefore unproductive, but let's not forget that the real genocide is just starting.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml -2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

that the real genocide is just starting

yes. the comparison is apt, thats exactly my damn point.

israel wouldnt be able to do anything close to what its doing right now without US weapons and money.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The comparison will be apt if Israel succeeds, but fortunately it hasn't yet. "This has the potential to be as bad as the Holocaust" and "this is as bad as the Holocaust" are different statements and mixing them up only hurts the cause.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

i said it was makong nazis blush. which it is.

does a genocide has to be super successful for us to be able to compare it with another?

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

i said it was makong nazis blush. which it is.

That would normally be read as: This genocide is worse than the Holocaust. This is why people are taking issue with it.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

people should be taking issue with the fact its happening at all.

instead i got this drivel that "voters dont mind!" or some shit

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah it is happening, too bad.

But putting this all on Biden means your entire rant is going to push people away from Biden, making Trump more likely to win. And Trump literally said they were going to make it even worse.

So you are essentially pushing Trump because it is a 2 party system. And Palestine will get genocide even more because of it.

That is why you are getting downvoted.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

trump is very likely to win regardless, nobody in history has ever managed to vote away fascism.

even if he doesnt, your actual overlords seem keen in making it happen anyway, as evidenced be the current state of affairs right now

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 1 points 6 months ago

instead i got this drivel that “voters dont mind!”

Yeah that's nonsense. Voters absolutely do mind, as they should.