126
Hay grown for cattle consumes nearly half the water drawn from Colorado River, study finds
(www.latimes.com)
this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2024
126 points (98.5% liked)
United States | News & Politics
7231 readers
186 users here now
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I do not understand why we don't just plant switch grass and be done with it? It's native to a large swath of the arable land, doesn't require as much (in some areas any) irrigation and it's good for the soil. https://cropwatch.unl.edu/benefits-switchgrass-hay-and-forage
https://utia.tennessee.edu/publications/wp-content/uploads/sites/269/2023/10/SP701-B.pdf
Edit: Also 6.24 is closer to a third of 19.25 than it is a half. Which is still a massive amount of water. Why inflate the numbers by saying nearly a half?
What's even more frustrating is that it's not useful. Here's an article about Utah's water usage WRT alfalfa:
So, Utah is using 2/3 of their water to produce 0.2% of their GDP and exports almost a third of it. It's completely stupid...
It's because you have to use your water to keep water rights. Flood irrigating alfalfa is an easy way to use up a lot of water to keep the rights without having to manage more complex farms. The current way that water rights works creates perverse incentives.
I dont understand why we dont ban cattle breeding & importing and be done with it?
Water which evaporates from reservoirs or wetlands isn't "drawn" from the river for human use. So it's about half of water removed for human use
Thanks for the clarification!