this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
497 points (95.1% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26880 readers
2014 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Wasnt Roiland actually cleared by the court?

[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, but: a lot of other pretty unwholesome stuff came out about him during the process and his contract has a clause in it that allows him to be terminated on that basis; it's actually pretty common for people in his kind of position to have contracts like that.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Got a lonk? Curious to see what other stuff came out.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

As far as I know, it was the sketchy text messages with minors.

[–] anonono@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

in any case it’s nothing that anyone dared to show any judge.

so for all intents and purposes, bullshit

[–] alertsleeper@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

doesn't matter, these"judges" already convicted him. Forget due process. Getting accused publicly == being guilty forever on social media.

[–] Nataratata@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's also important to remember that this is how most abuse cases work out. There is almost never enough evidence because it is almost impossible to proof beyond reasonable doubt. It's incredibly rare that someone gets convicted in an abuse case, no matter if they actually committed abuse or not. The victim has to basically stand in court with the gunk and fingerprints of the perpetrator still on them and video material that shows it wasn't self-defense from the other side, for any conviction to actually happen.

[–] Aiastarei@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So we should be satisfied ruining people's lives based on accusations alone?

[–] Nataratata@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's what you take from it? No, I think there should be no reports or articles or mentions on any cases that have not yet been decided upon by a court. A private's persons life is not ruined by an accusation because it almost never leads to a conviction, regardless of whether they are guilty or not.

[–] Aiastarei@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry, I thought you were saying in subtext that we should only judge based on accusations since evidence is hard to get for abuse cases. My bad!

[–] Nataratata@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

No, I am really not that good in English. I often realise people understand it slightly different than what I meant. But I can't do anything about it lol

[–] Oderus@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

How does that saying go again? By the time Truth puts its shoes on, a Lie has travelled around the world.