Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5295 readers

478 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

silence7@slrpnk.net

276

Election of Donald Trump ‘could put world’s climate goals at risk’ (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 7 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net

47 comments fedilink hide all child comments

If you're an American, and you want to stop Trump, it's important to be actively involved:

Check your voter registration - there's been an active effort to purge voter rolls, and if you moved or changed name, you'll need to register again anyways
Talk with people you know about voting for Democrats up and down the ballot. Personal endorsement matters.
Volunteer — it makes a real difference
If you can afford it, donate to the Biden campaign. Even fairly modest amounts of money from a lot of people add up to being able to hire staff and run ads.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

But he might bring about the complete collapse of the US... which would result in less emissions.

Try to be more optimistic!

[–] lefaucet@slrpnk.net 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Funny joke, but fer serious...

A complete collapse of the US wouldn't mean a carbon free utopia, it would mean corporations would be the defacto government (they already pretty much are, but we still have weekends and pollution control. Megacorps will turn everything into the mining towns of old where everyone is completely owned by the mining companies and pollution controls, labor laws and healthcare are non-existant.

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

In a world where US is the only country maybe yes. In real life though this would never happen.

[–] lefaucet@slrpnk.net 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Are you saying Europe would sweep in and save us? China and Russia? Our NAFTA 2.0 partners would say, "woah there, companies, we had a deal with your now-collapsed country."

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The way people cancel corporations for way less is a sign that they would also probably cancel companies who enslaved previously free people. It wouldn't surprise me is Europe and other allies came to the rescue with rescue plans that although helpful would bind the US into some sort of lock for many years to come. But I don't expect that distopian schenario to unfold just yet even though it does look bad over there

[–] lefaucet@slrpnk.net 1 points 7 months ago

Thanks for your optimism :)

I really dont think the US will collapse as in this hypothetical scenario, and I sincerely hope you're right.

[–] bufalo1973@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago

If it's the EU the binding could mean following the same rules than EU members. I don't see much of a problem there.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 0 points 7 months ago

Yeah I was just being fatuous.

[–] LordOfLocksley@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Don't threaten me with a good time