this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2024
673 points (98.0% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

5506 readers
703 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I know, I know: "grotesque"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago (5 children)

It's just another trade being eliminated by cheap manufacturing. Anyone with a 3D printer could download a gargoyle design, create an injection mold, and fill it with a fiber-plastic that resembles stone at a distance. While it requires talent and investment upfront, you could manufacture thousands of gargoyles in the time it takes a stonemason to make one by hand. It could be lighter, more detailed, and cheaper. And if you were to create market demand, you'll find 100 knockoff manufacturers coming out of countries without labor laws or IP protections.

[–] SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 months ago

Those cheap ones are available in cementious materials, they'd be fine for new build stuff, but that wouldn't fly with historic buildings, where it's often government mandate that things are replaced like for like. I work in conservation, and when we pull a stone, the replacement is often sourced from the same quarry (if possible the same vein) as the original. Mortar matching is also a thing, where a sample is sent into the lab, and the exact same mixture is used, right down to the bits of shell from the same beach if possible.
Also those cheap ones really don't have the lasting power of actual stone.

[–] IMongoose@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

When you put it that way, I might have to start installing gargoyles on buildings myself.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Imho, do it. We need a little more decorative element in our buildings. Brutalism is not good.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

I'll buy one, but I'm not going to make them. I barely have time to get the dishes done and keep up with laundry.

[–] Sizzler@slrpnk.net 1 points 6 months ago

Water jet and a block of stone.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

We don't need to make that many gargoyles though. They were mostly installed on high cost architectural buildings, not houses.

I'm any case, it only took this guy 17 seconds to make one from some the old fashioned way:

https://youtube.com/shorts/djbjbFXyN9E?si=NZVpBbJZqrbShXCS