this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2024
493 points (97.1% liked)

World News

38847 readers
2434 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Telegraph investigation reveals those on front line are being exposed to gases banned during wartime

Russian troops are carrying out a systematic campaign of illegal chemical attacks against Ukrainian soldiers, according to a Telegraph investigation.

The Telegraph spoke to a number of Ukrainian soldiers deployed in positions across the front line who detailed how their positions have been coming under near daily attacks from small drones, mainly dropping tear gas but also other chemicals.

The use of such gas, which is known as CS and commonly used by riot police, is banned during wartime under the Chemical WeaponsConvention.

Ihor, the commander of a Ukrainian reconnaissance team who is deployed near the front line city of Chasiv Yar, in Donetsk Oblast, told The Telegraph: “Nearly every position in our area of the front was getting one or two gas grenades dropped on them a day.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago (3 children)

What good is the law if it is not enforced?

[–] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They are enforced after a war or if Russia decides to punish them. Or the UN could do something but Russia can veto.

Instead of laws, think of them as suggestions.

[–] boredtortoise@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

Instead of laws, think of them as suggestions.

Good tip, applies to all laws

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It's a convention, not a law. States still have to pass laws to turn those into actually enforceable laws, called ratification (as opposed to mere signing which doesn't really mean much but moral support from the state's executive). And then it has to enforce those laws, also, not feel like breaking them.

The enforcement mechanism the international community has against states doing such things is to shitcan them. But Russia's in there anyway and nobody is going to escalate militarily over CS gas and it's not like Ukraine could counter-attack with ABC weapons if they wanted to, so... that leaves non-military escalation. Which includes sending Ukraine more weapons, of course. In a sense you should thank the Russians for giving Ukraine yet another good argument, the military efficacy of CS gas certainly doesn't cover the cost using it could incur for the Russians.

[–] Dupree878@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Is it really worth going to war over if a law could stop you from doing something?