this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

US Authoritarianism

746 readers
2 users here now

Hello, I am researching American crimes against humanity. . This space so far has been most strongly for memes, and that's fine.

There's other groups and you are welcome to add to them. USAuthoritarianism Linktree

See Also, my website. USAuthoritarianism.com be advised at time of writing it is basically just a donate link

Cool People: !thepoliceproblem@lemmy.world

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lemmylem@lemm.ee 0 points 6 months ago (6 children)

It appears that the claim that half of Americans make under $35,000 is not accurate. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the median personal income in the United States for 2022 was $40,480​ (FRED - https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MEPAINUSA646N)​. Additionally, data from DQYDJ shows that at the 40th percentile, income was approximately $58,001, suggesting that less than half of the population earns under $35,000​ (DQYDJ – Don't Quit Your Day Job - https://dqydj.com/average-median-top-household-income-percentiles/)​.

Furthermore, the median household income was reported to be $74,580 in 2022, a figure that significantly exceeds the $35,000 threshold​ (Census.gov - https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2023/demo/p60-279.html)​. This indicates that the median individual and household incomes in the U.S. are both higher than $35,000, disproving the initial claim.

[–] Cataphract@lemmy.ml 0 points 6 months ago

For you and !go_go_gadget@lemmy.world, isn't the Census bureau a national survey with self reporting that only covers like 1% of the population? Both "Fred" and dqydj.com use the Census bureau to calculate their viewpoints from what I understand? If I'm reading the government site wrong or looking at the wrong surveys please correct me. I understand the "Census" to be more of a judge or indicator of patterns but not to be used as concrete data in which to come to solid conclusions from.

I had ran into the census pdf as well before seeing this link, the beginning has an interesting passage which none of the authors seem to mention in the articles,

Real median household income was $74,580 in 2022, 2.3 percent lower than the 2021 estimate of $76,330. It was 4.7 percent lower than the 2019 median, the year before the start of the COVID-19 pandemic and the corresponding recession (Figure 1 and Table A-1).6 The estimate of median household income in 2019 was the highest since 1967 source

Also an important caveat,

The income estimates in the main sections of this report are based on the concept of money income, which is pretax and does not account for the value of in-kind transfers. Estimates of post-tax income and inequality are included in Appendix B. Real median post-tax household income exhibited a substantial decline in 2022 from 2021. This was due in part to the expiration of policies introduced in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, such as Economic Impact Payments and the expanded Child Tax Credit.


I've been reading over a few of the articles from www.dqydj.com and it feels very sketchy. I can pinpoint a few questionable passages that seem to pass on an intent, but in general how they dissect the data always has a "but we left out this part" footnote. It's especially hilarious with the article you linked,

What was the median household income? In 2023, $74,202 was the median household income in the United States. This is up from $70,181 in 2022 (unadjusted for inflation – see below).

They then proceed below to show a graph that completely contradicts their statement.

The paragraph above it makes a great copy-pasta though. If I'm reading any of this wrong, let me know.

[–] Spaceballstheusername@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Only 46% of the population are working. https://www.minneapolisfed.org/article/2022/whos-not-working-in-the-us-learn-the-basics So technically, technically the quote is correct. The stat you are quoting is the median salary of someone working full-time is $58,001. So it leaves out all those people un and underemployed or who just gave up on joining the workforce. Idk where you got the 40,480 because your link just goes to a broken link. Millennials are also making less money are less likely to be married and have higher unemployment numbers than gen x so our numbers would be more screwed than the overall median which is what the original tweet was referencing when saying stop asking us about buying houses or having kids.

[–] droans@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Only 46% of the population are working.

Shouldn't you be taking out children, students, retired people, and those who are unable to work?

The number is 76% if you only look at people aged 25-54.

[–] blusterydayve26@midwest.social 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If the median household income is 75k, assuming dual-income, then that’s probably where the 35k comes from: 75k/2 = 37.5k.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

But there are significant amount of households who just have one person making 75K instead

so per worker, it's actually 59K according to the data

https://www.bls.gov/news.release/wkyeng.t02.htm

[–] AncientFutureNow@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

are you trying to make me feel worse?

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

You're mixing measurements. Household != Individual.

[–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Median weekly earnings of full time workers is over $1100/week now, so the median full time worker is probably making well over $50k/year, if they can hold down a job for the full year and work full time hours.

Lots of people don't work because they don't want to work, and don't need to work: retirees, students, married to rich spouses, etc. Including them in the denominator can be helpful for measuring some things, but would be misleading to assume that the median individual income across all individuals would mean what most commenters in this thread seem to think it means.

[–] AFaithfulNihilist@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If you look at what they count as full-time jobs, And then you compare that to how many people are actually willing to offer full-time jobs rather than just a job that takes all of your time you might better understand this.

The numbers are manipulated by what they choose to exclude. And $50,000 in today's dollars is less than an elevator operator made during the Great depression.

[–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

what they count as full-time jobs

Isn't that just anyone who works more than 35 hours per week?

full-time jobs rather than just a job that takes all of your time

What do you mean by this?

Either way, they track several different alternative measures. One is the number of people who want to work full time but are stuck working part time for economic reasons, which has been lower the last few years than the previous decade.

Or if you'd want to look at those who hold multiple jobs, that's been climbing but still historically low.