this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2024
156 points (93.3% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3482 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

Well, first pay is not stagnant. Wage growth is actually outpacing inflation now. I know that's of little comfort to those who have fallen behind and need to catch up, or haven't benefitted from the wage growth, but you are factually incorrect here.

And you see what I did there? I made a point and then backed it up with a source.

But more importantly, this isn't my point. The original implicit claim is that people are pushing that the economy is fine and there are no problems, and then people followed that up by saying everyone is pushing that the economy is great, explicitly Biden saying so. I've not seen this, and you still haven't provided anyone actually doing so.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

The problem on your chart is the giant section where inflation peaked at 9% and wage growth was under 6%.

That means a pay cut of 3%, and while inflation is reduced NOW, that doesn't mean prices are going DOWN, they are simply going up less fast than they were when inflation was 9%.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee -1 points 6 months ago

Yes, I understand this point. Which is why I explicitly said "I know that’s of little comfort to those who have fallen behind and need to catch up." I know that your point is always what follows, which is why I preempted it.

Additionally, I was responding to a claim that wages have stagnated. This is not true, as my link shows, even if we are more strictly talking about inflation adjusted wages. So the link doesn't have a "problem."

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That article and you are full of shit. I don't care how many "jobs" you create if they all pay shit wages it means nothing.

You can site all the fucking sources you want I live in reality and here in Oklahoma one cheapest states to live in people are struggling to pay rent and buy food. So fuck off with her neoliberal bull shit.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee -3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Again, this all stems from me asking for someone to back up the claim that Biden is saying the economy is perfectly fine and there are no issues.

You brought up an unrelated claim, and are now attacking me personally for pointing out that the numbers don't back up your claim, by using your extremely limited anecdotal experience as proof.

This is some real bizzaro world shit right here.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

By the way here a source https://www.theguardian.com/inequality/2024/jan/15/worlds-five-richest-men-double-their-money-as-poorest-get-poorer

I'm sure you will ignore it and keep telling us how great the economy is doing and how us poors and working class just don't understand that the rich getting richer and corporations making more money that it is really all good for us too.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

First, Biden's name doesn't even show up in that article. So I'm not sure why it's being provided as evidence that Biden is saying everything is perfect.

Second, it's an article talking about the gap between the rich and the poor growing. . .and quoting plenty of people saying how this is bad and how taxing the wealthy for this money would be beneficial (both things I agree with BTW). And this is being used as evidence of the media saying everything is good? It's proving the exact opposite.

I’m sure you will ignore it and keep telling us how great the economy

At what point did I say the economy was great? Are you sure you're talking to the right person?

how us poors and working class just don’t understand that the rich getting richer and corporations making more money that it is really all good for us too.

Bro, I'm working class too. lol I'm not sure where you're getting all of this. The fact that I don't think everything is miserable, like you, doesn't mean I think everything is perfect and honky dory. Please consider that a bit more nuance than that can exist.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Your claims come from mainstream media. You must be rich fuck because is working class dont see this great economy you speak of. Also every article I read and from fucking experience tells me your full of shit.

Go take yourself back to bootlicking but data just released showing we grew a bunch of new billionaires proves the economy is fucked for everyone but the 1%.

Also the fact that this very article points to a problem and you ignore it. Done talking to you because you're either a troll or part of the problem.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 0 points 6 months ago

Your claims come from mainstream media

And you know where yours come from? Your feelings. Sorry if I find the MSM more reliable than your baseless claims.

you ignore it.

What do you think I ignored?