237
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024
237 points (97.2% liked)
News
39492 readers
2755 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
It's amazing that not only did they fuck up the regex, but only changed how the link was displayed and not where it linked to. And somehow their org is fucked up enough that someone not only wrote this incompetent code but it went into production.
FTFY
Any talent Twitter once had jumped ship a long time ago
I'm sure plenty of H1B visa talent is still there, terrified to do anything that Musk doesn't explicitly order them to do, thus resulting in the same sort of fuckups that would result if they weren't there. So I guess at least Twitter is stopping foreign people from having to go back to an impoverished life in Goa or wherever.
Marginalized non-white people working for him while afraid of the consequences of quitting or disagreeing must take him back to his childhood.
That's because apparently nobody is around to know you can't pɐɹsǝ 卄ㄒ爪ㄥ ɥʇıʍ Ṝ̷̟̿e̸̗̙̻̍̊̆͝g̷̺̠̦͍̭̜̬̩̎̃Ë̵̛͍̮̥͇͎͎̤͐͂̉̂͜x̸̧̙̎̇͊̈́͐̏͑̒͘
Wait, they just did a text replacement and didn’t change the anchor links? I tried x dot com and it redirects to twitter, so even if they changed the links, too, it would just send them back to twitter.
(laughs in SEO) You fools!
If they really wanted X to happen they’d do a full site migration using 301, or 308, redirects of twitter to x.
Do they just not have the resources to do this or what the hell is stopping them from doing it the correct way if that’s what they want? Doesn’t Musk own the x domain?
It was evident a year ago that Musk fired or drove away all their skilled, competent engineers.
They can't do it the right way because a) they don't know how b) nobody understands most of their existing services, and c) Musk is guaranteed to step in and fuck everything up.
My understanding is, Musk fired all the developers who actually understood how Twitter works, and now they don't know how to manage that migration without breaking the site.
Just optics, I guess? Probably some urgent drug-induced decree from Elron. They still have tons of references to Twitter in various parts of the site. The transition to the 'x' domain (which yes, Musk has owned since 1999) was rushed, hasty, and poorly done, not to mention incredibly stupid from a business perspective.
armchair developer here, but it wouldn't be that hard, right? Isn't it just a single line at the very root of the domain in .htaccess - or whatever equivalent if there's a different stack
I’ve never done the actual implementation myself, honestly. Redirects can be done via .htaccess (or equivalent), server side, or JavaScript.
Theoretically, yes, it’s that easy. However, pages should have 1:1 redirects for each page URL that matters. Then a strategy to prune the ones no longer needed/outdated by allowing them to 404, redirect to the most relevant subfolder, or just send to the main domain should be considered.
The list can be quite long. There’s more to it than all this as well, but that’s the general gist.
yeah I assumed everything stayed the same except domain - and if best practices are maintained then everything should have relative urls anyway...
Is it amazing? I think it's virtually expected.
You have it exactly backwards. They only changed where the links went, not how they were displayed. That's why it's such a phishing concern.
Nope, why would someone register carfatwitter.com if that was the case?
You could read the article, it explains it.
Are you serious?
It could work the way you're describing with the same effect, but that's not what's being described.
Quoting your quote, now with emphasis:
So, as I said, the link text you see appears unchanged, but where it goes is changed. That's why it's a phishing concern.
No, apparently what happens is people post netflitwitter.com, linking to netfltwitter.com, and the X app changes the visible link text to netflix.com but not the link target.
The way you're describing it is the reverse, like people post netflix.com and the link is changed to netflitwitter.com. That's not what they're doing. Or, if it was that people posted netflitwitter.com and it linked to netflix.com, how would that be a problem?
No. If the link was left pristine, phishing would be impossible, because the original links we're discussing went to genuine sites and the displayed link would be obviously garbage.
The whole problem is that people are linking to netflitwitter with a display of netflitwitter, then the regex changes the link target, so you see the original, sane address, click on it, and get deceived into going to a target the regex fabricated.
That COULD be what happened, and it would have a similar effect, but it wasn’t what happened. If you read information about this that becomes apparent. They didn’t change the link target, they changed the link text only.
Someone registers spacetwitter.com and sets up an adversarial site. They then make an “X” post mentioning spacetwitter.com. The app creates a link to spacetwitter.com but changes the text to say spacex.com.
Please read this: https://krebsonsecurity.com/2024/04/twitters-clumsy-pivot-to-x-com-is-a-gift-to-phishers/
Notice how it says modifying links that mention “twitter.com” to read “x.com” instead.