287
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] imallamabanana@lemmy.blahaj.zone 59 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

I'm not a trump supporter but I'm also not a sensationalism supporter. He made an analogy in his post, "he gave out a traffic ticket instead of a death sentence." Now we accept that the sentence given by the judge was not a traffic ticket, but we insist that the death sentence part was meant literally? Now honestly, I hate Trump as much as anyone but honest, accurate, and irrefutable criticisms are going to get us farther than stretches of sensational word-twisting.

[-] grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world 55 points 3 years ago

The problem here is there's a sub-group of Trump supporters who will read this and think "yeah, someone should just take out Hunter Biden, that will send a real message". And there's a sub-group of that group that will possibly try to do it.

Trump is well aware, and possibly proud of, the fact that statements from him can lead to real world violence.

He was trying to get the metal detectors removed from the Jan 6 rally because "they're not here to hurt me". This indicates he knew people would try to come armed and that they intended to hurt someone, just not him.

[-] dangblingus@lemmy.world 13 points 3 years ago

He speaks far too colloquially and off-the-cuff for a President for my liking. A complete buffoon who can't speak unless it's in hyperbole.

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 12 points 3 years ago

While I get what you're saying, Trump benefits far too much from not literally saying things, but letting his supporters run wild with what he's implying.

It's no different from when he starts a rumor by saying "People have been telling me..." followed by some shit he just made up about an opponent. He gets to claim immunity from being the one that starts the rumor while at the same time putting it out there for his supporters to grab onto.

The question is, do you believe that he wants his supporters to think he literally wants the death penalty for Hunter Biden?

If the answer is yes, then he shouldn't be defended in any way.

[-] keeb420@kbin.social 10 points 3 years ago

im well past giving this gaping void of humanity the benefit of the doubt.

[-] yata@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

Of course he deliberately mentioned the death sentence to put associations into the skulls of his radicalised extremist cultist base. Haven't you been alive for the last 7 years?

[-] zaph@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago

You're trying to apply logic to an illogical person. That's where we went wrong in 2016.

[-] Sir_Kevin@discuss.online -3 points 3 years ago

Yeah I'm going to block this community if something like this comes up on my feed again.

[-] Fapper_McFapper@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 years ago

Don’t let the door hit you where god split you. Bye Kevin.

this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
287 points (78.9% liked)

politics

31179 readers
2708 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS