this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7226 readers
409 users here now

What's going on Canada?

Communities

🍁 Meta

πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories

πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer

πŸ’» Universities

πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping

πŸ—£οΈ Politics

🍁 Social and Culture

Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
otter@lemmy.ca
2
Canadian schools are experimenting with cellphone bans, but some parents say the devices are lifelines (www.cbc.ca)
submitted 1 year ago by CrimsonFlash@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
43 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I do feel for the girl in this article for whom it was used as a coping mechanism for bullying. No policy comes with zero downsides

Right, it's kind of a trolley problem. Is it better to do lesser harm through action (banning cell phones, meaning a few students like this can't reach their family during school hours), or greater harm through inaction (loose cell phone policy, harming the learning process for everyone, inviting violence against teachers who are competing against addictive algorithms for their students' attention)?

Cell phones barely existed when I was in school and were certainly out of reach for students. Bullying still happened (personal experience, yay) and staff would shut that shit down when they saw it or it was reported.

[–] Grennum@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I also went to school with no cell phones, and was bullied mercilessly. Staff didn't care then, and I doubt they care now. I'm glad you went to a school where the adults cared.

[–] RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago

When was this? I was in high school during the early 00's. There were no cell phones, not because of policy, but because they just weren't commonplace.

[–] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not lesser harm since no one else is gonna pay for the mental health bills nor could revert the damage done from the bullying. And when someone snaps from bullying you are gonna see blood for sure. (and little kids/teens snaps from very little things, talking from experiences.) have you ever seen clip where a chubby kid slams a bully teasing him upside down? the bully got slammed could be paralyzed for life, or worse dead, the chubby kid that got bullied could bear that trauma for life, it happens when bully think no one is watching and it's "life as usual", picking on this bigger kid to have some power fantasy or bragging to his mates. If the chubby kid had the tool, pull out a phone and push a button and say, "I'm live streaming this and will report to teacher and my parents, watch your action and leave me alone." Wouldn't the violence resolved without potential life changing events?

[–] RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I meant harm in that it affects "one or a few students" rather than affecting "practically all students."

[–] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

school is place to learn 2 things:

  • proper social interaction and becoming a responsible adult.
  • essential knowledge and skills before you branch out and find your thing to earn your own meals.

And IMO, the first point is way more important than the second. Let's see the implication by breaking down the proposed ban.

From the anti-bullying side:

  • deterrent tool is taken away
  • bully now have a "safe" grey area to do their thing and become he says/she says.
  • teachers or admins could not keep eyes on everyone, and some of them don't care if there are no bodily harms happened.
  • you know how much teens will listen to what adults said, even with laid out consequences.

From the learning, focus during instructional time:

  • I grew up without any gadgets(45yo) so no gameboy until I was at high school. Everyone still found ways to distract themselves from boring classes.
  • for schools without student chromebook/laptop/tablet, you lose a big chunk of diversity in "asking questions" or "find alternatives". aka, I feel teacher said something off, how do I find something to support my talking point or argument? Fact checking, math checking, etc.
  • The guys that are not interested in your material and have nothing to distract themselves with will just stare at something they interested in or day dreaming stuff. It will not help average score or engagement.

For engagement, from my old self and what my friends here from different background/countries/age bracket discuss their past, the one common thing is fun knowledgeable teacher and how enjoyable their class was last life time long. It shapes their understanding, how they engage other people or topics involving different areas. kids and teens are like herds of fun chasing animal, if even half of your class is having fun and discuss the materials and exchanging questions etc, the rest will follow cause they don't want to be "left out".

In short, if a teen can learn how to calculate DPS and build sets for their favorite game but fails the math about probability and expected value, the teacher is doing something wrong.

[–] RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Again, your old self, and mine for that matter, didn't have the constant, always-on global communications device in your pocket with precision-engineered addiction algorithms frying your dopamine receptors. Yes, I'm going to boomer out here and say that ShitTok and their ilk are a scourge on youth and on society as a whole. The predictive promotional algorithm, flashy multimedia content, and, let's be honest, what amounts of soft porn in many cases, absolutely lays waste to attention spans and studious pursuits β€” doubly so in young, fertile minds. No teacher, no matter how good they are, can compete with that.

I can't link to it right now for obvious reasons, but there was a post a little while ago on /r/teachers from an experienced educator lamenting on how the behaviour of students has degraded dramatically in just the last few years. They not only lack respect for their teachers, they're actively disrespectful and sometimes flat-out violent towards educators and staff (particularly when their dopamine pumps are confiscated), and willfully destructive. Students lash out, destroy expensive equipment for fun, and are just downright ineducable.

I may be mixing my sources right now, I believe this was from a corresponding YouTube video that was linked in the post or comments, but the concluding notion I was left with is that there's an epidemic of emotional dysregulation among youth, induced by combination of poor parenting, lack of effective authority, and β€” the big one β€” smartphone addiction. The sentiment that lingers in my head: kids today are no longer interested in learning, they're only interested in how they can be entertained in the next five minutes.

I think there could be an agreeable balance where students are expected to leave their devices out of sight and on mute during instructional and recess periods. This could be a teaching tool for them to learn about the common courtesy of not being disruptive in settings where attentiveness and other activities are expected and appropriate. Or, really, they could just leave their phones in their lockers. We survived just fine without them at all.