181
submitted 2 years ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] simplejack@lemmy.world 41 points 2 years ago

The thing is, a lot of the people voting for RFK are low information voters, and low information voters don’t pay attention to endorsements. They’re checked out.

[-] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

My mother is planning to vote Republican this year because she "doesn't pay attention to that political crap"

I keep telling her that she really needs to pay attention because she's on disability, gets medical benefits from the government, food stamps, etc.

Yet she still refuses to get informed.

I've tried talking to her about politics, I've tried showing her what Republicans are doing, I've tried asking her what she'd do if her benefits went away, etc. all she does is get angry about trying to bring politics into a discussion.

At this point I've told her that if the worst should happen with Republicans getting their way and she loses her benefits I don't plan to help her at all. She'll be at the mercy of her own decisions. (Something her and my dad have said to my siblings and I a lot growing up.)

Edit: She votes Republican straight down the ballot every single election. And for positions where people don't declare their political party she doesn't vote for those positions because she, "Won't trust a rat who won't say who they are."

Edit 2: I accidentally a word or 2.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 34 points 2 years ago

She votes Republican straight down the ballot every single election. And for positions where people don't declare their political party she doesn't vote for those positions because she, "Won't trust a rat who won't say who they are."

"Doesn't pay attention to that political crap"

So that was a fucking lie.

[-] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 years ago

Exactly

She's straight up got the Republican brain worms bad.

[-] Joxnir@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago

At this point I’ve told her that if the worst should happen with Republicans getting their way and she loses her benefits I don’t plan to help her at all. She’ll be at the mercy of her own decisions. (Something her and my dad have said to my siblings and I a lot growing up.)

I'm curious, what did she say to that?

[-] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 years ago

"They wouldn't do that."

You know, the thing they constantly say they're going to do.

She doesn't even consider it a possibility so me saying that I won't help her if it happens is a non-thing.

And if you're curious, her opinion on the repeal of abortion rights is also shitty. "I live in a state where I can get one so it's not an issue."

And when I mention that it's a possibility that if Republicans gain power they'll pass a national ban she again shoots it down as something that they wouldn't do.

[-] Joxnir@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Sounds like she's in denial. Does she also change the subject when losing an argument?

Anyways, I think you have better chances addressing her denialism than to argue any other political point. As long as someone won't argue in good faith, all other arguements and debates become pointless diversions.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 years ago

A big public noisy endorsement might reach a few though. Not all, but some, and every bit helps

[-] simplejack@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I’ll take it, but I feel like this will only shave off fractions off a percent.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 years ago

If the election is as close as it was in 2020, that's enough to swing the outcome.

[-] simplejack@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

True, although that election didn’t have a 3rd party candidate polling as high as this one. Biden is going to have to eat more into RFK.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Many are but not all. He’s got some devoted followers

[-] simplejack@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Correct. He has some legit fans, but most of his polling numbers are from people who are not really tuned.

[-] Bipta@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

They also are likely attaching value to the name Kennedy though, and so other Kennedys may have outsized influence with them.

[-] simplejack@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah, but they’re not watching the political news and listening to anything the candidates, or their families are saying.

They just see “Trump, Biden, or Kennedy” on a ballot, and think “Trump and Biden aren’t my favorites, but I think I remember the Kennedys being cool once upon a time.”

[-] gnate@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

A lot of them are Roganites. Not checked out, bit low quality information.

this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2024
181 points (97.4% liked)

politics

30994 readers
1936 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS