this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2024
326 points (86.9% liked)

World News

38790 readers
2445 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I don’t blame them. Ukraine needs to take the war to Russia to win.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Crampon@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Maybe. But destroying the Russian dictatorship is a moral obligation for everyone in the free world.

All Russian infrastructure and assets are valid targets. Both inside and outside of Russia.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Attacking civilian infrastructure like power plants is a WAR CRIME and that's why it's a huge deal that Russia has been attacking power plants. An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind. All moral obligations are equal. That means doing unethical and immoral actions in pursuit of an ethical and moral goal means you are no longer fighting a good fight.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Claiming that they're typically valid targets is very different from "sometimes they are, in extreme circumstances".