this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
892 points (99.9% liked)

196

16552 readers
2024 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] starship_lizard@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (15 children)
[–] chalkman@sh.itjust.works 84 points 1 year ago (74 children)

Hard-core authoritarian communist. The kinda peeps who support Stalin and shit

[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 34 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Isn't "authoritarian communist" kind of an oxymoron? 😂 like the whole point of communism is that there isn't a ruling class. I guess Russia and China were never really communist, just statist authoritarian right? I mean, the Nazis called themselves Socialist. They were nowhere near that

[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 31 points 1 year ago

Isn’t “authoritarian communist” kind of an oxymoron?

Yes. Yes, it is. I sometimes call them “pseudocommunists” for this reason.

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Isn't "authoritarian communist" kind of an oxymoron?

Most real life implementations of communism used an authoritarian one party system. You can say these aren't true examples of communism, but that just ends up sounding like cope unfortunately.

[–] CrimsonOnoscopy@beehaw.org 25 points 1 year ago

None of those states ever gave economic or political power to the working classes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blackbelt352@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 1 year ago

As how Marx outlined Communism as the evolution of Capitalism once it reaches a scale of production that everyone can have their needs met, resulting in a classless, stateless, moneyless society, then yes authoritarian communist is an oxymoron.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (73 replies)
[–] lauchmelder@einweckglas.com 46 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)