this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2024
582 points (97.4% liked)

Fuck Cars

9669 readers
26 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 166 points 7 months ago (2 children)

“We want to be a middle man”

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 71 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

They say that during the California gold rush, the people who got richest were the shovel salesmen

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 17 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

Pretty sure it was the people who had the money for heavy equipment and labor that could get the deep gold the prospectors found, but couldn't reach.

[–] Acters@lemmy.world 22 points 7 months ago

Pretty sure it was the few people who controlled the amount of supply to the people who wanted the gold after taking the gold from the miners

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 4 points 7 months ago

That came later.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 13 points 7 months ago

They are fools, the richest were the people who bought the mines.

[–] MadBob@feddit.nl 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

To be fair, Trainline started up years ago as a middle man that charge the same for tickets as train operators do (the price is regulated by National Rail) but with a surplus for a service that doesn't convey any extra value, and they're still quite popular.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Wait, how is that profitable?…

[–] Sizzler@slrpnk.net 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Advertising and travel data, other than IT low overheads.

[–] MadBob@feddit.nl 1 points 7 months ago

They spent a lot on advertising to begin with, specifically advertising that broke the guidelines, but was only taken down after everyone had heard the name and the idea that it was cheaper to use Trainline: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2009/may/20/asa-trainline-ad https://www.railforums.co.uk/threads/misleading-advertising-by-trainline.104250/

They eventually started getting commissions from train operating companies (TOCs) for selling tickets, which I believe the TOCs in turn used as justification for raising ticket prices above inflation. I used to work for a TOC that at the time refused to work with Trainline, because it meant having to install special ticket machines at loss only to make more loss on ticket revenue, but according to a mate of mine who still works there, they now accept the tickets because it's such a headache for staff when people come in having spent money for an invalid ticket.

So it's just shit for everyone except Trainline, and quite a stark example of how unsuited for public infrastructure a free market model is. Imagine if some company came along and said you could pay your gas bill through them for cheaper and it just wasn't true but everyone believes it so gas is just dearer now. Fucking bananas.