223
submitted 2 years ago by Type1@midwest.social to c/usa@midwest.social
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] galoisghost@aussie.zone 9 points 2 years ago

Given these people have nowhere to go why not set aside some public land that allows long term encampments or maybe if it’s a concern about the safety of these encampments, the government could acquire an empty office building and retrofit it with modest accommodations for these peoples.

Or you could just admit it’s not about helping these people it’s about making them go away.

[-] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 1 points 2 years ago

Those are both reasonable solutions and I'm not arguing against them. I just pointed out that this fight isn't about banning homeless people from sleeping outside. It's more nuanced than that.

this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2024
223 points (98.3% liked)

United States | News & Politics

4305 readers
324 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules:

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

No pics of text

Memes are now allowed, as long as they're US centric, general political memes please see !politicalmemes@lemmy.ca

Post news related to the United States.

No NYPost, Breitbart, Daily Mail, Daily Wire

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS