this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
554 points (96.5% liked)

Technology

60018 readers
2776 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Safe Streets Rebel's protest comes after automatic vehicles were blamed for incidents including crashing into a bus and running over a dog. City officials in June said...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Yes, but SanFran ain't one of those. Taxis have the same problem cars do, which is size.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can tell you aren't from SF. Because no one from here calls it SanFran. But I digress. Uber is huge here because it is where it started. And buses come with other baggage. Many homeless people and plenty of pervs doing shady things deter people from using the system regularly. Having seen the system it is substantial, but getting out of the city is the issue. San Francisco proper is very small 7x7 miles (49 square miles, Easter egg from being 1849 and the 49ers). But going anywhere outside of the city is where things take forever and why most affluent people do not use those systems. 2 hours back and forth is not economic on time.

[–] dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

No, I'm not. Homeless on our public transit isn't an issue because our police actually responds to driver calls.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am well aware of both the benefits of public transport and this image specifically. This is irrelevant to our discussion

[–] dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not if I'm arguing that self driving taxis are stupid

[–] SCB@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Self driving taxis aren't stupid. They better fit the existing infrastructure within America.

Taxis as a whole generally serve a different market function than public transportation in the US.

Im all for gutting zoning, and building dense, walkable cities, full of public transportation free at POS - but that's not the world we live in.

Self-driving taxis are such a massive net boon for people that it's not even a comparison to the alternative

[–] dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

On that I will agree, but I still stand that self driving taxis are stupid. BUT, they are necessary due to how NA cities are built, and getting rid of them would require many other changes as well