this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
297 points (90.7% liked)

politics

19126 readers
2341 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 42 points 7 months ago (3 children)

What a bizarrely titled article. The entire thing is an opinion piece but I do think there's some legitimacy for thinking that Trump's deteriorating mental state will become harder to hide but to get him effectively off the ballot that slippage will need to be widely recognized before the RNC convention on July 15th. In the unlikely event that he's generally perceived as a gibbering idiot by that date there's pretty much no chance that Lara Trump nor Michael Whatley would consider a super-delegate style override of the primary results... if it was still in the hands of establishment GOPers that might be possible but would still be highly irregular and unlikely.

I am curious to see how public perception of Trump shifts but given the electoral system Trump will be on that fucking ballot in November unless he's literally dead - to do anything else would result in vote splitting that'd guarantee a democratic victory (which would be nice - but GOPers aren't likely to go for it).

If Trump was publicly committed to senior care, openly announced his dementia and endorsed some other candidate (all highly unlikely given the narcissism) he'd still get 20% of the popular vote from the paranoid and low information voters.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If Trump was publicly committed to senior care, openly announced his dementia and endorsed some other candidate (all highly unlikely given the narcissism) he’d still get 20% of the popular vote from the paranoid and low information voters.

Dont tease me.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 10 points 7 months ago

Given the narcissism, it's more likely for Trump to come out onstage and say, "Je suis Napoleon, Vote for me over sleepy joe!" Than ever admitting to a personal flaw.

[–] cogman@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

In the unlikely event that he’s generally perceived as a gibbering idiot by that date there’s pretty much no chance that Lara Trump nor Michael Whatley would consider a super-delegate style override of the primary results

They can't, like legally and literally. The RNC rules are setup without super delegates and they can't backport those in right before the convention.

Literally the only thing that would keep him off the ballot is if either he dies (which will be a HUGE clusterfuck) or a court ruling finds him ineligible to hold office (which, he just won cases keeping him off the ballot so that's really unlikely).

He could be drooling on stage while actively shitting his depends, he's still going on the ballot. That was 1000% on display with Dianne Feinstein, for literally years, she showed very clear signs of dementia/Alzheimer's.

And the scary thing is that none of this will stop Trumpers from voting for him. They'd write his name in even if he does die.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago

"Can't" is a word you should never use when it comes to politics. It's all about costs and while there may be customs and norms and charters and rules... they aren't laws and can be bent - just at a cost. There are no laws about how political parties nominate electors and recent history should tell you that even laws can be bent.

Otherwise, yea, I totally agree.

[–] audiomodder@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Dementia has never stopped Republicans. Reagan, anyone?

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago

The dementia was Reagan's biggest plank in his platform. Those actually making the decisions found it super helpful. That's why this time they're running 2 demented candidates. Even if they lose they win.