this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
333 points (96.1% liked)

Technology

34988 readers
392 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Like Bro I use Linux. I agree it's more efficient, that's why I said it's better for older machines like yours.

What I don't understand is criticising Windows over this specific new issue. It's like hating the Nazis because they had bad interior decor, instead of the fact they committed genocide. Like it's not even an issue, Windows has much bigger real issues.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Not everything is a comparison. It's entirely possible to discuss one new negative thing about Windows without comparing it to the worse things you dislike about Windows. I don't have an old computer, I have a wicked fast i7 12700kf, 32GB of DDR5 4800, 2TB Samsung 970 NVMe drive, Auoris RTX 30170 ti, and a z690 Auoris pro MOBO. That doesn't mean I want my frickin OS gobbling up my resources. I bought powerful components for my uses, not for Microsoft to calculate how to best serve me ads on my computer, using my computing power. Oh, and I do use Linux.

[–] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It didn't realize I was replying to someone else. The person I thought I was replying to was on a 4790K.

This change isn't a problem at all, just like the Nazis interior decor wasn't a problem. AI needing certain instructions to run well isn't unreasonable at all. They are using these instructions and resources to provide a service. This isn't them wasting resources unnecessarily, presumably they are only used if you engage those services. Don't get me wrong Microsoft does waste resources but this isn't an example of that afaik.

What you and others are doing is a motte and bailey argument. First you say these AI requirements are unreasonable, then I say actually they aren't unreasonable at all and is well exceeded by the actual Windows 11 requirements or most machines made in the last 10 years, then you counter that the Windows 11 is slow and has unreasonable requirements. Do you see how the first and second points are unrelated? The general Windows 11 requirements are way more strict than requiring SSE 4.2. any PC back to like 1st or 2nd gen will have the needed instructions. Maybe the 16 GB requirement is a bit more than some people have, but it's not a large amount either and you can just keep using it without the AI features.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I think the 16GB requirement is ridiculous, considering Microsoft's own laptops and Surface Pros don't come with 16GB standard. They seem to be trying to drive sales through intentional obsolescence of adequate hardware.

[–] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

16 GB should be the minimum for a new PC these days. The fact they are selling less takes the piss.