this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
32 points (97.1% liked)

Canada

7152 readers
409 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Regions


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mid density is extremely resource efficient (both in terms of building it, and the infrastructure serving it), and desirable -considering the property values in cities with lots of mid-density housing. It's a shame we lost so many years not building it.

[–] nueonetwo@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago

Mid density building is also dense enough to support frequent transit services. You're not going to get 20 minute buses in the suburbs forcing everyone to drive which means more spread out lots to accommodate 2+ cars, larger roads, etc.

Mid density doesn't work for everyone but it works for a lot of people, the issue is we have so little of it in most Canadian cities so people aren't exposed to it enough to think of it as a viable option.