this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
46 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

12 readers
1 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the federated social networking ecosystem, which includes decentralized and open-source social media platforms. Whether you are a user, developer, or simply interested in the concept of decentralized social media, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as the benefits and challenges of decentralized social media, new and existing federated platforms, and more. From the latest developments and trends to ethical considerations and the future of federated social media, this category covers a wide range of topics related to the Fediverse.

founded 2 years ago
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Do you understand what siphoning business means? What business do you think Facebook is in? It wasn't users. It was ads.

[–] PabloDiscobar@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is only one metric for a social network, the number of users.

Youtube channel? subscribers

Twitch channel? subscribers

Twitter? Followers

That's about who gathers the most people, end of the line. If an instance managed to become a pole of gravity then it will be worth money.

And before you tell me that you can subscribe to a different instance, well, you can also subscribe to a different social network.

but fine, we disagree.

[–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

An instance isn't the social network though. The fediverse is. You're missing the whole point.

[–] bvanevery@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well I can see one thing that kinda belies your point of view at present. Stability. Some people have presciently worried that their instance can implode, taking all content a user has made with it. Larger instances that are more stable, that have more backup infrastructure and ongoing commitment to operations, could out-compete smaller instances. Why this might arise, could be a historical accident of successful crowdfunding campaigns or something. I'm not sure how someone might do a better job of securing more server resources than others. Obviously a deep pocketed corporation who wants to influence the Fediverse, could do that.

[–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

But those are unrelated. We're talking about admins not acting in the best interest of the users so they can pump up numbers and sell their instances. You're talking about related concepts, but different motivations and intentions.