this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
737 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

59594 readers
3363 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] realitista@lemm.ee 13 points 6 months ago (4 children)

If you read the article, it's not a statement with entirely no merit.

The engineers prioritized an algorithm which is far more likely to be useful in real world scenarios where you keep trying to cram a bunch of stuff in the frunk and close it (who hasn't done this?) rather than the edge case of repeatedly testing it with vegetables until you stick your finger in it.

Anyway, I suppose it's back to the drawing board.

[–] cooltrainer_frank@lemmy.world 62 points 6 months ago (2 children)

This is why you keep your safety features consistent. If they want bag close mode, then make it where you hold instead of press a button or something. It "happening automatically" is just unpredictable to most, not magical

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 46 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

In addition, what if the person noticed the obstructions and then moved them away, and then accidentally got a finger in there? That's a realistic scenario too.

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago
[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 27 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

There should be no algorithm. It should be done by a human. There are no amount of lines of code I will ever make up for knowing intent and what the current situation is.

If it's going to be closed by software it needs to prioritize safety 100% of the time. If more pressure is needed and that pressure needs to come from a human.

[–] blusterydayve26@midwest.social 7 points 6 months ago

I think an algorithm that sounds unprepared to deal with children is insufficient.

[–] Zoot@reddthat.com 4 points 6 months ago

Youre constantly forcing your trunk closed? That doesn't sound normal to me actually, and sounds like the opposite of what I would want. Hello, groceries, important things, stuff I don't want stolen so goes in the trunk?