this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
27 points (96.6% liked)

D&D Next - 5e Discussion

2396 readers
1 users here now

A place to discuss the latest version of Dungeons & Dragons, the fifth edition, known during the playtest as D&D Next.

Join our discord! https://discord.gg/dndnext

-- Rules --

  1. Be Civil. Unacceptable behavior includes name calling, taunting, baiting, flaming, etc. Please respect the opinions of people who play differently than you do.
  2. Use Clear, Concise Titles.
  3. Limit Self-Promotional Links. External links to blogs, kickstarters, storefronts, YouTube channels, etc, must be related to DnD and posted no more than once every 14 days. Affiliate links are never allowed.

This is a new community and the rules are in flux. Please bear with us (and give your feedback!) as we navigate building this new community. Thank you!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

My paladin is now level 4 and has 19 strength and 15 charisma. I know it is probably better to take the ability score increase and get another +1 on the majority of rolls I'll be making but that's just so boring!

I'm taking Shield Master instead.

Does anyone else have this conflict?


Most people seem to be misunderstanding. I don't mind having to make "tough choices" in general, only when the obviously correct choice is boring and the suboptimal one is the cool fun one.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jonatan83@lemmy.fmhy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s a very anti-fun design decision. But then again, feats are an optional rule for some reason so it would be hard to have it a different way.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The designers are really kidding themselves by calling them optional still.

I do know someone who doesn't allow feats at their table because they feel feats are overpowered.

My table gets a free feat at lvl 1.