this post was submitted on 07 May 2024
252 points (94.1% liked)

Interesting Global News

2652 readers
744 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Australia's Mona asked a court to reverse its ruling that allowed men inside a women's only space.

Archived version: https://archive.ph/oHT6U

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheControlled@lemmy.world 81 points 6 months ago (42 children)

There shouldn't be such thing as gender x only spaces. Or race, or sexuality. The women aren't wrong about their points, but that doesn't make it an acceptable or thankfully, legal thing to do. I'm sure the guy who sued them did it for all the wrong reasons though. Both sides seem a bit slimy.

[–] Kacarott@feddit.de 55 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

I didn't read into this particular issue, but I know the museum in question, have been there a couple times, so some context:

  • it was founded by some eccentric multi millionaire, who basically just does whatever he wants. The museum was originally free for everyone, until eventually he realised he was draining money really fast, so now it's only free for locals.
  • the museum changes it's "theme" somewhat frequently. One time I was there the whole place looked like a grocery store, and the stairs to the actual museum was like hidden away in part of the store.
  • the museum seems to thrive on getting strong reactions from people. Much of the art inside is quite shocking or provocative. They have an app where you can rate how much you like each artwork, and apparently they actively remove artworks which are too universally liked.

So it doesn't surprise me at all that the museum is trying to be women only, but I really doubt it will be permanent, and I suspect that the strong public reactions is exactly the point.

[–] TheControlled@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

I kind of suspected this. Usually forseeble controversy like this is a ploy, especially with art and art spaces.

[–] TassieTosser@aussie.zone 6 points 6 months ago

Depends on how much money the exhibit draws. Iirc the Wall of Vaginas was supposed to be temporary but it's still up as far as I know.

[–] KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (4 children)

So there shouldn't be girls' locker rooms either?

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 22 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Why do we need girls locker rooms when we’ve had the technology for mixed gender locker rooms for generations? We call them doors and use them even in single gender bathrooms.

Certainly it’s inappropriate for sexual predators to be able to leer at girls or women, but there I also no need to have a lack of privacy from those of the same gender, if that’s what people wish.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago

Locker rooms are a little different than bathrooms.

[–] refalo@programming.dev 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Apparently you've never been in a locker room before.

[–] iegod@lemm.ee 10 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Modern locker rooms can be built with individual stalls so I understand the point being made. Personally though, it's less efficient to have a locker room with multiple single-serve rooms. Extra material, extra cost, decreased functional area, additional readying time. If you use a locker room frequently you know how invaluable all those things are.

[–] JayDee@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

These are the same excuses given for the enshittification of American bathroom stalls.

Fuck the companies - give the humans the privacy they like. Many locker rooms I've been in already have stalls, too - the shower stalls.

[–] iegod@lemm.ee 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So my work did something like this when they moved buildings. Our old locker room was a long rectangular room with lockers on one side, a bench on the other. No privacy once you were in that space.

New one is mixed usage private change rooms and showers. It's a huge, huge, huge downgrade on the space. So, anecdotally, not on board. The old one still had bathroom stalls and private bathrooms if you needed it. I don't understand the push to make it all uniform when that's not the best use for the majority of the users. I'm not sorry about this opinion.

[–] Balex@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Why do you think that space is a huge downgrade though?

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Not when you only need one large area rather than 2. Building double the showers and a shared area should be more efficient than having 2 sets of half for each gender.

It also makes it easier for families, non binary or trans people.

[–] akakunai@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago

I mean, I can see where you're coming from but locker rooms are a significant part of sport.

Comradery is built in locker rooms and they are where young athletes spend a large portion of their sporting time. This is especially true for certain sports needing significant prep time like (ice) hockey.

With young people already facing a loneliness crisis, we don't need to be isolating them further to solve a non-problem.

[–] Sethayy@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Got this one from tumblr but its something along the lines of we go to the bathroom to shit, not have some special women fun time in there.

If there was a way to have my own room entirely without anyone else that'd be 100% preferred, but gender is the last thing im thinking about when someone's peeking down the cracks of my stall

[–] Iceblade02@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Idk, everytime I go partying with friends it definitely seems like womens bathrooms are a communal activity.

[–] Sethayy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago

Though I can't really see a party being the best representation for the populace no?

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

But who was nuance 🤔

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (40 replies)