this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
35 points (94.9% liked)

Futurology

2154 readers
57 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
voidx@futurology.today
Lugh@futurology.today
Espiritdescali@futurology.today
AwesomeLowlander@futurology.today
35
When people rated moral reasoning responses to issues, and were unaware some were generated by AI, they rated the AI's as better than the humans. (www.nature.com)
submitted 9 months ago by Lugh@futurology.today to c/futurology@futurology.today
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Probably. They've mastered the art of corporate-speak; another natural language task which doesn't require precise abstract reasoning.

I'm kind of convinced that the set of possible moral philosophies most people would agree with in practice is the empty set, at this point, so I'm not surprised those kinds of answers do better.