this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
109 points (88.7% liked)

politics

19233 readers
2173 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Let's welcome the new moderators of c/politics.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

The new mod just defended Trump calling nazis "very fine people."

A civility rule attached to a community that regards platforming fascist misinformation as an obligation just results in mods bending over backwards to make things comfortable for fascists. We've all seen this shit happen on reddit, and I for one don't have the energy to participate in such a community here. I see no reason to provide content to help such a community flourish.

Any suggestions on another politics community that isn't hell-bent on becoming r/anothernazibar?

[–] BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well I can say lemmy.ml and lemmygrad will never allow Nazis to proliferate on their instances, but people are convinced they’re “tankies”, so I guess the question is would you rather deal with communists or fascists?

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I'm kinda dumbfounded that no one's hosting one over on blahaj.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I think being called lemmygrad Is a bit of a hint at maybe being tankies

[–] B16_BR0TH3R@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

After further questioning from the reporter, and responses from Trump about people who were at the Charlottesville rally to support keeping the Lee statue, the president said, "You’re changing history. You’re changing culture. And you had people — and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists — because they should be condemned totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists."

All those who marched in the rally marched in a nazi rally. If you march in a nazi rally in 2017, it's because you're a nazi.

Trump said the side that was all nazis included very fine people. This bit:

But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists.

was a lie.

[–] B16_BR0TH3R@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So not a single person in that rally was just a white nationalist, every participant must have been a national socialist? If so, prove it. If not then you were the liar in this instance, not Trump.

Trump is clearly a moron, a narcisist, he's probably a sociopath and he's definitely a curse on the globe and on US politics specifically. Still, for some reason, people keep dragging up misleading and false quotes to try to condemn him, instead of just pointing to his actual words and actions, which are just as bad as the imagined ones.

And then they wonder why the left is failing and Trump remains popular, as if the answer wasn't staring back at them from the mirror...

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So not a single person in that rally was just a white nationalist, every participant must have been a national socialist?

They were marching with obvious nazis. They were nazis. It's not that hard to comprehend.

Not like there's much of a fucking difference between nazis and nazis who want to be called by a name they think is somehow better.

[–] B16_BR0TH3R@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You're missing my point entirely. If you want to criticize someone then you need to be better than them. More accurate, more truthful and more levelheaded. If you just go down on their level and fling the same dirt around as them - like you're doing - then you've accomplished nothing and you'll convince no one.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you want to criticize someone then you need to be better than them.

Well, they're nazis and I'm not. So mission fucking accomplished.

[–] B16_BR0TH3R@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Who needs luck to be better than nazis? It's real easy: just don't be a nazi.

[–] dudebro@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

Do you think they're going to overmoderate?

Can't you just block the people you don't want to interact with?