this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
111 points (89.9% liked)

World News

38847 readers
1937 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 42 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Canada sanctions FOUR INDIVIDUAL SETTLERS in usual performative bullshit move

Fixed that headline (and article) for ya...

[–] czech@lemm.ee 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yea what are even the implications of being individually "sanctioned"? They can't travel to Canada now??

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Cost for the taxpayer and a government worker named Sharon justifying her paycheck and patting herself on the back, after her team of six spent 3 weeks working out the details. I'm sure the office events committee organised cake and the afternoon off.

(Yes, I've had to do consulting work with federal governments before and it's like this)

[–] Beetlejuice001@lemmy.wtf 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

While I agree with the sentiment wholeheartedly, it’s something

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No, it really isn't. It's a diversion to stop people asking for more action.

[–] Beetlejuice001@lemmy.wtf 1 points 5 months ago

Yes it very well could be, absolutely. They could build on it though. I’m not holding my breath