this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
766 points (97.2% liked)

Greentext

4159 readers
1114 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Alright, but the daily expenditure will go down alongside your current weight. The average* 35 y/o 5'9" man, who exercises at least 30min a day 5 days a week, who weighs 217 will maintain weight at 2,871 while at 165 lbs will maintain at 2,452.

*average is emphasized to help explain why the calorie number is larger than in previous comments, which were a minimum estimate.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

A 420 calorie drop from a 52-pound weight loss implies a resting metabolic requirement for body fat tissue of about 8 calories per pound, which I think is a serious overestimate but I'm not sure. I've seen some sources claim 2 calories per pound for fat and 6 calories per pound for muscle, but other sources have claimed significantly higher amounts.

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 1 points 4 months ago

Yeah it's really hard to pin down consistent numbers on this subject due to both interpersonal differences and demographic trends in data.