this post was submitted on 25 May 2024
515 points (93.1% liked)

Cool Guides

4692 readers
1 users here now

Rules for Posting Guides on Our Community

1. Defining a Guide Guides are comprehensive reference materials, how-tos, or comparison tables. A guide must be well-organized both in content and layout. Information should be easily accessible without unnecessary navigation. Guides can include flowcharts, step-by-step instructions, or visual references that compare different elements side by side.

2. Infographic Guidelines Infographics are permitted if they are educational and informative. They should aim to convey complex information visually and clearly. However, infographics that primarily serve as visual essays without structured guidance will be subject to removal.

3. Grey Area Moderators may use discretion when deciding to remove posts. If in doubt, message us or use downvotes for content you find inappropriate.

4. Source Attribution If you know the original source of a guide, share it in the comments to credit the creators.

5. Diverse Content To keep our community engaging, avoid saturating the feed with similar topics. Excessive posts on a single topic may be moderated to maintain diversity.

6. Verify in Comments Always check the comments for additional insights or corrections. Moderators rely on community expertise for accuracy.

Community Guidelines

By following these rules, we can maintain a diverse and informative community. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out to the moderators. Thank you for contributing responsibly!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

You asserted that there was no God.

You're unable to prove your claim.

Now you're resorting to an ad hominem attack.

You have a right to say you don't believe in God, but no way to prove it.

And here's a list of ad hominem attacks, so you can improve your logic.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

[–] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Six hours later: resorts to ad hominem attacks when he can't defend his argument. The hypocrisy is off the scales!

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Are you following all my posts now?

Maybe you should go outside and touch the grass instead.

[–] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Fabrication, exaggeration, and deflection, all in two sentences. Impressive but it seems you have a lot of practice.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You really amuse me.

You can tell because if you annoyed me, I'd have blocked you.

But I find you hilarious.

Please keep on venting your scorn and derision.

[–] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Scorn? Derision? Lol.

I like to hear myself talk. Look how I explain myself like a Bond villain.

Now I'm going to make some more things up in response to a comment about how I make things up. Behold my lack of self awareness! Quail before my hypocrisy!

I'm blocking you because you're a predictable, boring hypocrite, one of those people whose point is "whatever makes me 'win', even if I contradict myself elsewhere to 'win' again". Feel free to have the last word for others but I won't see it.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago